LawInfo

Antitrust Attorneys - Trade Regulation Attorneys

Antitrust Attorneys


What is Antitrust and Trade Regulation?

Trusts and monopolies are concentrations of wealth in the hands of a few. When a few competitors agree to fix prices, rig bids or divide up customers, consumers lose the benefits of competition. To prevent trusts from creating restraints on trade or commerce and reducing competition, most states and the federal government have antitrust laws that apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution and marketing. The main federal antitrust laws passed by Congress are: the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Clayton Act, the Wilson Act, Robinson-Patman Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act.

  • The Sherman Act
    The Sherman Antitrust Act was passed on July 2, 1890 as the principal law expressing national commitment to a free market economy in which competition free from private and governmental restraints leads to the best results for consumers. The Act outlaws all contracts, combinations and conspiracies that unreasonably restrain interstate and foreign trade. This includes agreements among competitors to fix prices, rig bids and divide up customers. The Sherman Act also makes it a crime to monopolize any part of interstate commerce. An unlawful monopoly exists when only one firm controls the market for a product or service by suppressing its competition rather than taking sales from less efficient competitors by means of legitimate competition and lower prices.

    The Department of Justice alone is empowered to bring felony criminal prosecutions under the Sherman Act. Individual violators can be fined up to $350,000 and sentenced to up to 3 years in federal prison for each offense. Corporations can be fined up to $10 million for each offense. Under some circumstances, the fines can go even higher. To secure a conviction of antitrust violations, an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) must present evidence that when submitted to a jury or judge would prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant entered into a contract or conspired with others to restrict trade, suppress competition or fix prices, and that this action substantially affected interstate or foreign commerce.

  • The Clayton Act
    The Clayton Act is a civil statute that carries no criminal penalties. It was passed in 1914 and was significantly amended in 1950. The Clayton Act prohibits mergers or acquisitions that are likely to lessen competition. Under the Act, the government can challenge any merger that a careful economic analysis indicates is likely to increase prices to consumers. The Act also prohibits other business practices, which under certain circumstances may harm competition. All persons considering a merger or acquisition above a certain size must notify both the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission.

  • The Federal Trade Commission Act The Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce, but carries no criminal penalties. The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for policing violations of the Act.

Most if not all states have comparable statutes prohibiting monopolistic conduct, price fixing agreements, and other acts in restraint of trade having strictly local impact. Various other regulations regarding unfair competition are also enforced on federal and state levels.

Hiring a Antitrust Lawyer or Trade Regulation Attorney?

Whether or not you are currently in litigation, counsel and representation from an antitrust attorney or trade regulation attorney can save you a lot of money and problems down the road. For example, you may find it beneficial to seek legal counsel on compliance with anti-trust and trade regulation compliance. Talk to a qualified antitrust attorney or trade regulation attorney that can best serve your needs in your situation.

To find a Antitrust Law Attorney in your area, please select a state below:

Alabama Antitrust Law Lawyers
Alaska Antitrust Law Lawyers
Arizona Antitrust Law Lawyers
Arkansas Antitrust Law Lawyers
California Antitrust Law Lawyers
Colorado Antitrust Law Lawyers
Connecticut Antitrust Law Lawyers
Delaware Antitrust Law Lawyers
District of Columbia Antitrust Law Lawyers
Florida Antitrust Law Lawyers
Georgia Antitrust Law Lawyers
Hawaii Antitrust Law Lawyers
Idaho Antitrust Law Lawyers
Illinois Antitrust Law Lawyers
Indiana Antitrust Law Lawyers
Iowa Antitrust Law Lawyers
Kansas Antitrust Law Lawyers
Kentucky Antitrust Law Lawyers
Louisiana Antitrust Law Lawyers
Maine Antitrust Law Lawyers
Maryland Antitrust Law Lawyers
Massachusetts Antitrust Law Lawyers
Michigan Antitrust Law Lawyers
Minnesota Antitrust Law Lawyers
Mississippi Antitrust Law Lawyers
Missouri Antitrust Law Lawyers
Montana Antitrust Law Lawyers
Nebraska Antitrust Law Lawyers
Nevada Antitrust Law Lawyers
New Hampshire Antitrust Law Lawyers
New Jersey Antitrust Law Lawyers
New Mexico Antitrust Law Lawyers
New York Antitrust Law Lawyers
North Carolina Antitrust Law Lawyers
North Dakota Antitrust Law Lawyers
Ohio Antitrust Law Lawyers
Oklahoma Antitrust Law Lawyers
Oregon Antitrust Law Lawyers
Pennsylvania Antitrust Law Lawyers
Rhode Island Antitrust Law Lawyers
South Carolina Antitrust Law Lawyers
South Dakota Antitrust Law Lawyers
Tennessee Antitrust Law Lawyers
Texas Antitrust Law Lawyers
Utah Antitrust Law Lawyers
Vermont Antitrust Law Lawyers
Virginia Antitrust Law Lawyers
Washington Antitrust Law Lawyers
West Virginia Antitrust Law Lawyers
Wisconsin Antitrust Law Lawyers
Wyoming Antitrust Law Lawyers


Related Antitrust Law Information

Connect with an Attorney

Find an attorney in your area

Connect Today

Need Forms?

Search our database

Search Forms

Discussion Boards

Get public help/feedback

Search Topics

Featured Lead Counsel Rated Attorneys