Sherman Oaks Employment Lawyers
Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP

Employee rights protected by state and federal laws are an essential component of human and civil rights. By protecting the rights of employees, employment laws make our society more humane, equal and productive.

At Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP, we help you assert and protect your rights. Our attorneys work collaboratively with our clients to find solutions to complex legal challenges that reflect the unique circumstances of each case.

Whether you are an employee being sexually harassed, discriminated against or wrongfully deprived of overtime pay and seeking recovery, you will likely find the experience confusing, tedious and emotionally stressful.

As experienced Sherman Oaks Employment Lawyers, we will help navigate you through the legal process in pursuit of justice. We provide solid legal guidance in all aspects of state and federal labor law issues, including:
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Retaliation
  • Employment Contracts
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Racial Discrimination
  • Sex Discrimination
  • Pregnancy Discrimination
  • Sexual Orientation Discrimination
  • Age Discrimination
  • Religious Discrimination
  • Disability Discrimination
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
  • Disability Leave and Accommodations
  • Wage-and-Hour Overview
  • Unpaid Overtime
  • Meal & Rest Periods/Expense Reimbursement
  • Class Actions
  • Legal Issues Faced by Women in the Workplace
We practice exclusively in employment law and are passionate advocates for the protection of your rights. Our Firm takes a limited number of cases so we can provide each client we represent with superior service. We understand that clients depend on our Firm to handle issues that are critical to their well-being. When we choose to represent a client, we do so with a commitment to seeking the best possible result that meets their objectives.

Our attorneys have gained a reputation for our aggressive and passionate advocacy for our clients’ rights and interests. Whether we are handling a case involving race discrimination, sexual harassment, wage-and-hour violations or any other violation of employee rights, we aggressively pursue the best results on behalf of the clients we represent.

While we advocate for our clients, we are mindful that many of our clients are going through difficult circumstances. We make a sincere effort to make our office a supportive and friendly environment where clients can communicate openly about the facts of their case. We are here to help.

In each case we handle we prepare for the possibility of trial. We believe that our thorough approach to trial preparation and case management has resulted in tremendous results — in and out of the courtroom.

As respected Sherman Oaks Employment Lawyers, we make your needs our top priority. We are accessible and promise to communicate with you regularly concerning your case, and consult with you every step of the way regarding available legal options.

In the legal community, our Firm is recognized as a team of aggressive and hard-hitting litigators, noted for our preparation, attention to detail and zealous advocacy on behalf of clients. Opposing attorneys throughout Southern California know that we will take a case to court if we do not receive a substantial and fair settlement offer. We serve clients in Los Angeles County and throughout Southern California, and regularly appear before the trial and appellate courts of California.

If you or someone you know in the Los Angeles area or throughout Southern California needs the assistance of an experienced Sherman Oaks Employment Lawyer, call Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP today at 866-776-4716, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.


Practice Areas and Legal Definitions


Labor Laws:

Historically, labor laws have focused on such matters as eliminating unsafe workplace conditions, securing a living wage for employees, and eliminating, or at least, tempering the strife that often occurs between employee and employers. Since the appearance of organized labor, laws have established collective bargaining rights, and have sought to prevent either employers or employees, individually or through associations or unions, from engaging in unfair labor practices. It is well-established, by various statutes, that both sides to a labor dispute are legally required to engage in good faith collective bargaining. Modern labor laws also address such complex and often emotionally charged issues as strikes, picketing, mutual injunctive relief and lockouts.

Labor and Employment attorneys can help employers with the following:

  • Reviewing client employee handbooks, manuals and policy statements
  • Assisting with federal and state wage and hour law issues and claims
  • Representing employers before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies
  • Providing advice on issues involving National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) representation and elections including campaign assistance
  • Representing employers in unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board and state labor agencies
  • Providing representation for grievance and arbitration hearings under collective bargaining agreements
  • Collective bargaining on behalf of clients including strategic planning and acting as spokesperson
  • Counseling on issues related to strikes or lockouts and providing related litigation support

Employment Law:
Employment law is a well-established body of statutes and judicial decisions covering all rights and obligations within the employer-employee relationship, including current employees, job applicants and former employees. It covers a wide range of legal issues, ranging from employment discrimination and wrongful termination to matters involving wages and workplace safety. Many employment law issues are governed by applicable federal and state employment law, but a number of issues are determined according to basic contract law.

Employee Rights:

All employees have basic rights arising from both state and federal laws. Some of these rights include: the right not to be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, skin color, gender, pregnancy, religious beliefs, disability, age, and in some places, marital status or sexual orientation; the right to a workplace free of harassment; the right to be paid at least the minimum wage as provided by federal or state law; the right to overtime wages as provided by federal or state law; the right to a safe workplace and the right to take leave to care for a personal or family member's serious illness, or following the birth or adoption of a child.

Employment Discrimination:

Discrimination generally occurs when an employee is intentionally treated differently because of race, color, religion, national origin, disability, gender, age, and in some states, sexual orientation. Employment discrimination claims may be prosecuted under various state and federal statutes. Even if the employee’s evidence is sufficient to show discrimination, an employer may be able to justify a particular job action by demonstrating that such treatment arose out of business necessity, or that a legitimate job qualification required consideration of factors that had an unintentional discriminatory effect. When the employer makes such a legitimate justification, the employee must show that discrimination, not the employer’s justification, was the true reason for the action.

Age Discrimination:

It is unlawful for an employer, employment agency or labor union to discriminate in employment on the basis of age. This includes refusing to hire an individual or firing an employee. It also includes an individual’s compensation, the terms, conditions, and privileges of his or her employment, and all employee benefits.

Disability Discrimination:

Both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protect individuals with disabilities from employment discrimination. An individual with a disability is defined as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, has a record of having such a physical or mental impairment, or is regarded as having such impairment. The term is broadly defined to include any physiological, mental or psychologically-based impairment, but it does not include mere physical characteristics or cultural, environmental, or economic impairment—the impairment must cause a substantial limitation to a major life activity. Temporary conditions, such as a broken arm or the flu, would not be considered substantial limitations amounting to a disability entitled to statutory protection.

Wrongful Termination:

Termination of employment cannot be classified as "Wrongful Termination" unless it is in violation of some fundamental public policy, as set forth in a state or federal statute, regulation or constitutional provision. Examples of Wrongful Termination include situations where:

  • An employee is discharged for failure to comply with an order to perform an act that violates some law, ordinance or regulation, or
  • An employee is discharged in retaliation for complaints about conduct by the employer that he or she believes to be unlawful, e.g., failure to pay overtime, or failure to comply with safety regulations.

Sexual Harassment:
Sexual harassment is any unwanted and unwelcome sexual behavior. It involves a broad range of conduct, including such verbal harassment as derogatory comments, explicit sexual comments and descriptions of sexual exploits, leering or requesting sexual favors. The term also describes physical harassment, ranging from inappropriate touching to outright sexual assault. In order to be classified as illegal the conduct in question must be both unwelcome and offensive to the victim.

Sexual harassment is a form of sexual discrimination, prohibited in employment settings under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title IX of the 1972 Education Act makes sexual harassment in schools or other educational settings unlawful. The Federal Fair Housing Act also provides protection against sexual harassment, and most states have enacted legislation making it unlawful.

Overtime Compensation:

Under both State and Federal law employers are required to pay additional compensation to eligible employees who work more than forty hours during any seven-day period. For every hour over forty hours in any given workweek the employer must pay the eligible employee at least one and one-half times the employee's ordinary hourly rate.

Defamation (Libel & Slander):

Defamation is the communication of a false and unprivileged statement that exposes another to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or which causes him or her to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in his or her trade or occupation. The defamatory statement must be communicated to someone other than the person to whom it refers and it must refer to a living person.

Defamation communicated verbally it is called "Slander," but if it is communicated in writing, it is called "Libel". As a general rule it is easier to recover damages in a lawsuit for libel than in a slander lawsuit. Most defamation litigation in the employment arena concerns the employer’s “qualified privilege” to defame. & Under this concept, employers and former employers are often protected from liability for defaming employees or former employees. By its very definition, however, the privilege is “qualified,” and not “absolute”. It is generally limited to situations in which the employer or former employer is making a good faith communication of information to someone who has a legitimate interest in receiving it. A good example of this is a former employer’s good faith response to a new or prospective employer’s inquiry about the job performance of a former employee.  Generally speaking, even if the information given is false and damaging and would otherwise give rise to a defamation lawsuit, it will be protected under the “qualified” privilege.

If the communication exceeds the scope of the privilege, the privilege is not available. For example, if the communication to your new or prospective employer is not in response to an inquiry, but a voluntary and unsolicited communication, liability for defamation will attach if the information is untrue. Even if the communication is made in response to prospective employer’s inquiry, false and damaging information will not be protected by the privilege if it is made with knowledge or reckless disregard of its falsity, or with the intent to cause injury to the former employee. It is important to remember that however damaging it may be, a truthful statement cannot form the basis of a defamation lawsuit. This legal truism is often expressed in the phrase:  "The Truth is a complete defense to a defamation action".

Severance Agreements:

A severance agreement is a form of settlement agreement under which an aggrieved employee agrees to accept an agreed sum of money in exchange for, among other things, abandoning all claims against the employer.  Where it can be negotiated, a severance agreement saves money and aggravation for both sides. Severance agreements commonly include such provisions as "mutual non-disclosure of terms," an agreement that the employee will not compete against the employer, and that neither the employer nor the employee will make negative comments about the other.

Trade Secrets Agreements:

Employment contracts frequently contain provisions for the protection of the employer’s “trade secrets”. These may range from customer data of one kind or another, to company designs, or even “secret recipes”. Typically, the Trade Secrets clause of an employment contract will provide for “liquidated” damages in the event of disclosure of the information. Liquidated damages are a set dollar figure agreed-upon in advance, to be paid in the event the contract clause is violated.

Non-competition Agreements:

Non-competition agreements are provisions contained within an employment contract which restrict the activities of an employee after leaving the service of the company. Courts treat non-competition agreements with suspicion—with an eye toward preventing unnecessary and unreasonable interference with a person’s livelihood after severance of the employer/employee relationship.

The Courts will often decline to enforce “unreasonable” non-competition agreements. A non-competition clause in the agreement under which a used car lot employs an auto mechanic will likely be summarily rejected by the court as unreasonable. The agreement must be reasonable in duration. A non-competition agreement barring the sales manager of a used car lot from engaging in the used car business for the rest of his or her life, or for 50 years, would probably be denied enforcement, while one with a 2-year term might well be enforced.  Non-competition agreements must be reasonable in the area covered. If the agreement precludes the sales manager from engaging in the used car business anywhere in North America, it will almost certainly be denied enforcement as unreasonable. If the area is limited to Los Angeles, for example, it would probably withstand court scrutiny.

Whistleblower Claims:

Whistleblower Claims involve employer retaliation, sometimes to the extent of Wrongful Termination, against an employee who reports the improper or unlawful conduct of another employee or of management itself to government authorities. It is illegal for an employer to retaliate against a “whistleblower.”

Administrative Law:

Administrative Law is a system of justice outside the judicial system that is designed to bring resolution to conflicts arising within a detailed and technical structure of regulations. Administrative Law Courts have a reputation for resolving issues with greater speed and efficiency than the judicial system. Final Administrative Law decisions can be challenged in the Courts, but not until all administrative remedies have been exhausted. Final Administrative Law decisions can also be converted to Court Judgments and then enforced by any of the traditional remedies available for the enforcement of civil judgments.

Injunctions:

Injunctions are a type of Court Order that either requires or prohibits specified conduct or behavior. Injunctions are remedies frequently used in employment cases. They involve such situations as injunctions requiring striking public employees to return to work, or injunctions requiring someone to stop engaging in an unlawful employment practice.  Willful failure to comply with an injunction can lead to a citation for contempt of court, and can result in significant money sanctions or even time in jail for the purpose of coercing compliance.

Workers’ Compensation:

Workers’ Compensation is a state-run system under which employees receive various types and levels of compensation for on-the-job injuries. Generally speaking, the dollar amount of compensation in Workers’ Compensation cases is much lower than in ordinary civil actions to recover damages for personal injuries. On the other hand, the level of proof required is much lower than in a personal injury case. The claimant in a Workers’ Compensation case is not required to prove that the employer was negligent or otherwise at fault. All the claimant need establish in a Workers' Compensation case is that the employee was injured in the course of his or her employment, and that the injury was not the result of the employee's own willful misconduct.

Employment Policy Manuals & Employee Handbooks:

An extraordinarily high percentage of Employment Law conflicts arise because there simply is no established company policy on a particular issue or the existing policy is either unknown or poorly understood. Competent Employment Law counsel can help draft and put together a company policy manual that is both comprehensive and understandable, and an employee handbook that leaves no doubt as to what is expected from each employee, and what he or she can expect from the company.

Preparation and Presentation of Employee/Management Classes Covering California Sexual Harassment & Employment Discrimination Issues:

Most Sexual Harassment and Employment Discrimination cases these days are the result of ignorance of and lack of sensitivity to these issues at various levels of management. Arranging for formal classes concerning these matters can be both expensive and inconvenient, but the results of employee/management education about these matters will usually pay enormous dividends in terms of smooth employer/employee relations, and also in the peace of mind associated with avoiding expensive litigation and exposure to civil liability.

If you or someone you know in the Los Angeles area or throughout Southern California needs the assistance of an experienced Sherman Oaks Employment Lawyer, call Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP today at 866-776-4716, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.

Professional Profiles

If you or someone you know in the Los Angeles area or throughout Southern California needs the assistance of an experienced Sherman Oaks Employment Lawyer, call Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP today at 866-776-4716, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.

ADDRESS OF THE FIRM:
Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP
15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 420
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Telephone: 866-776-4716
Fax: 818-788-2464

MEMBERS OF THE FIRM:

Barry M. Appell, Esq.

Barry M. Appell has spent most of his fourteen years of practice litigating harassment, discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, wage and hour, and other employment related claims, including class actions. After several years representing employers, in 2004, Mr. Appell started his own law firm with Mika M. Hilaire, where he primarily represents employees. Shortly thereafter, Stephen Benardo joined the law firm to form Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP.

Mr. Appell has successfully litigated many cases, including multi-million dollar wage and hour class actions. He has prevailed many times in the California Courts of Appeal, including in the published decision in the case of Silver v. Boatwright. Mr. Appell has also been cited as a legal commentator by the court in the appellate decision in Grafton Partners LP v. Superior Court.

His dedication to his clients and his record of success resulted in Mr. Appell being named among the best lawyers in Southern California when he was named a Rising Star in 2004, and then has been named a Superlawyer every year since 2005.

Mr. Appell is a member of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the San Fernando Valley Bar Association, and the California Employment Lawyers Association. He has also volunteered as a mediator at the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Mr. Appell graduated from UC Hastings College of the Law in 1994 and from California State University, Northridge, cum laude, in 1991.

Areas of Practice:
  • Employment Law
  • Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Wage and Hour Law
  • Business Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Appellate Practice
Bar Admissions:
  • U.S. District Court Central District of California, 1994
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of California, 2000
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of California, 2002
Education:
  • J.D., University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, California, 1994
  • California State University, Northridge, California, 1991
    • Honors: Cum Laude
Honors and Awards:
  • "Super Lawyers," Southern California
Professional Associations and Memberships:
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association


Mika M. Hilaire, Esq.
Ms. Hilaire Practices in all areas of employment law and litigation, including handling claims of harassment, discrimination, wrongful termination and wage and hour issues. Ms. Hilaire also has experience in litigating large and complex class actions. She represents clients in employment matters in state and federal courts, arbitrations, administrative proceedings and mediations throughout California.

Ms. Hilaire's experience and dedication has led to an impressive record of successes for her clients. Most notably, she has negotiated mid to high six figure settlements pre-litigation and has obtained similar settlements after the commencement of litigation. Ms. Hilaire graduated from UC Hastings College of the Law in 2000, and from UC Berkeley in 1996.

Areas of Practice:
  • Employment Law
  • Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Wage and Hour Law
  • Business Litigation
  • Class Actions
Bar Admissions:
  • California, 2001
Education:
  • J.D., University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, California, 2000
  • University of California, Berkeley, California, 1996
    • Bachelor of Arts
Professional Associations and Memberships:
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles
  • Black Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles


Stephen M. Benardo, Esq.
Prior to the formation of Appell | hilaire | Benardo LLP, Mr. Benardo was Senior Counsel in the Century City law firm of Silver & Freedman, where he practiced law for seven years in one of the most respected labor and employment law departments in Los Angeles. Before that, Mr. Benardo practiced for three years at Knee & mason, a boutique, full-service labor and employment law firm in Century City. Mr. Benardo began his career as a lawyer at the long Beach firm of O’Flaherty & Belgum, in the area of employment law litigation. Mr. Benardo graduated form UCLA School of Law in 1991, and from the University of Minnesota in 1985.

Areas of Practice:
  • Employment Law
  • Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Wage and Hour Law
  • Business Litigation
  • Class Actions
  • Appellate Practice
  • Unfair Competition
  • Trade Secrets
Litigation Percentage:
  • 75% of Practice Devoted to Litigation
Bar Admissions:
  • California, 1992
  • U.S. District Court Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of California
  • U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of California
Education:
  • J.D., University of California at Los Angeles School of Law, Los Angeles, California, 1991
  • University of Minnesota, 1985
Professional Associations and Memberships:
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association
Past Employment Positions:
  • Silver & Freedman, APLC, Senior Counsel


Jordan A. Gropack, Esq.
Jordan A. Gropack began working with Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP in 2004, and has spent most of his legal career in the field of employment law. He has worked on a variety of cases including those involving discrimination, wrongful termination, harassment and wage and hour issues. He has also been involved in several major class action litigations. Mr. Gropack's representation has been almost exclusively of employees, although he has also advised employers and litigated on their behalf.

Mr. Gropack sits on the Executive Board of the Labor and Employment Section of the Beverly Hills Bar Association. He is also a member of the California Employment Lawyers Association and the San Fernando Valley Bar Association. A Los Angeles native, Mr. Gropack graduated from California State University Northridge, cum laude, and Southwestern University School of Law.

Areas of Practice:
  • Employment Law
  • Discrimination
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Wage and Hour Law
  • Class Actions
Bar Admissions:
  • California, 2006
  • U.S. District Court Central District of California, 2006
Education:
  • J.D., Southwestern University School of Law, Los Angeles, California, 2006
Professional Associations and Memberships:
  • California Employment Lawyers Association
  • American Bar Association


Additional Questions or need further information?

Mika Hilaire
Appell | Hilaire | Benardo LLP
15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 420
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Phone: 866-776-4716
Fax: 818-788-2464

Remember, the more information you provide, the easier it is for us to help you.

How would you categorize the incident?

Discrimination
Harassment
Wrongful termination
Other

Please describe the incident and your role in it:


* Please enter the security code shown below:

Captcha Image

      

 

Experience, Ethics, Reputation.
Choose With Confidence.

Lawyers featured on LawInfo.com must be Lead Counsel Rated

Why Choose a Lead Counsel Rated Attorney?

  1. Professional Experience: Lead Counsel Attorneys average 21.6 years experience practicing law.
  2. Relevant Experience: Lead Counsel Attorneys devote at least 30% of their practices to the area of law in which they're listed.
  3. Reputation: LawInfo conducts peer reference checks to verify status and reputation in the legal community.
  4. Spotless Record: All Lead Counsel Attorneys are verified to be in good standing with their state bar associations and have no client related disciplinary action.

The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Attorney Advertising
Lawyer Marketing by Lawinfo.com
Copyright © 2009 LawInfo.com, Inc. All rights are reserved.
No portion of this site may be reproduced in any manner in any medium without the express written consent of LawInfo.com, Inc.
close

Call Us Now!
866-776-4716