Sexual Harassment Lawyers | Serving Walnut Creek, CA
Dedicated,Results-Driven Client Service!
Sexual Harassment Lawyers | Serving Walnut Creek, CA
A reputable law firm in Walnut Creek, California, Bryant Whitten, LLP specializes in helping clients with Sexual Harassment issues.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Sexual Harassment Lawyers | Serving Walnut Creek, CA
Get experienced Sexual Harassment help from The Law Offices of Daniel Feder, a reputable law firm in Walnut Creek, California.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Sexual Harassment Lawyers | Serving Walnut Creek, CA
Get local legal help for your Sexual Harassment issues. Lawless & Lawless assists clients in the Walnut Creek, California area.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Sexual Harassment Lawyers | Serving Walnut Creek, CA
Salinas Law Group, serving clients in the Walnut Creek, California area, a reputable legal practice for Sexual Harassment issues.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Sexual Harassment Lawyers | Serving Walnut Creek, CA
Kletter Law helps Walnut Creek clients with their Sexual Harassment needs.
Se Habla Español
Lead Counsel independently verifies Sexual Harassment attorneys in Walnut Creek by conferring with California bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Sexual harassment includes unwelcomed comments, touching, sexual advances, and requests for sexual favors. Sexual harassment does not have to be sexual in nature. Even conduct that makes someone uncomfortable can be harassment. This type of harassment often occurs in the workplace, creating a hostile or offensive environment and adversely affecting the victim’s work performance.
You should report the conduct to your employer and file a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. It is also to your advantage to consult with a qualified Walnut Creek attorney experienced in this area of law when the offensive conduct begins. The attorney can sue for emotional distress, pain and suffering, and mental anguish.
It is in your best interest to get legal help early on in addressing your situation. There are times when hiring a lawyer quickly is critical to your case, such as if you are charged with a crime. It may also be in your best interest to have a lawyer review the fine print before signing legal documents. A lawyer can also help you get the compensation you deserve if you’ve suffered a serious injury. For issues where money or property is at stake, having a lawyer guide you through the complexities of the legal system can save you time, hassle, and possibly a lot of grief in the long run.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.