Lead Counsel independently verifies Religious Discrimination attorneys in Phoenix by conferring with Arizona bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Discrimination based on a person’s faith can occur in all areas of life, but often arises when at the workplace or when people are looking for housing. Both the state and the federal government have laws that protect you from the harms of religious discrimination.
Not only do laws prohibit discrimination against your religious practice but it is also unlawful to discriminate against you for associating with people of a particular religion or for wearing garments such as a Jewish yarmulke, a Muslim chador, or a Sikh turban. If you have experienced religious discrimination, A Phoenix attorney skilled in handling religious discrimination cases can advise you on how to protect your religious rights.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
Prepare for your consultation by writing down notes of your understanding of the case, jot down questions and concerns for the attorney, and gather your documents. Remember that you are trying to get a sense of whether the attorney has your trust and can help you address your legal issues. Questions should include how the attorney intends to resolve your issue, how many years he/she has been practicing law and specifically practicing in your area, as well as how many cases similar to yours the attorney has handled. It can also be helpful to broach the subject of fees so that you understand the likely cost and structure of your representation by a specific attorney and/or legal team.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.