Lead Counsel independently verifies Mold attorneys in Lakeland by conferring with Florida bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Exposure to mold, a fungus not of the animal or plant kingdoms, is known to cause respiratory ailments and allergies. Water damage or moisture causes mold to grow and cause unhealthy environments and even property damage. Mold victims often go for months or years before their aliments are properly diagnosed.
If you suspect your heath has been harmed by exposure to mold you should immediately consult a Lakeland lawyer who handles mold exposure cases. The lawyer can assess your specific mold exposure situation and determine if you are entitled to compensation. He or she will investigate the cause of your exposure, form your case, and may be able to negotiate a settlement.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
The more experienced a lawyer is in legal practice, the more likely he/she will be able to bring about a successful resolution to your issue. Since experience matters, lawyers who’ve been practicing law for many years (with a successful track record) tend to be in high demand. You should look for information about a lawyer’s experience and ask questions during the initial meeting. It’s a very good idea to ask the lawyer how many years he/she has been practicing law and the expected outcome of your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.