Lead Counsel independently verifies Medicare Fraud attorneys in Missoula by conferring with Montana bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Medicare is a federal health insurance program benefiting those who are 65 years and older, certain younger people who have disabilities, and those with permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis. Medicare fraud occurs when false claims are made.
If you are under suspicion or arrested for Medicare fraud you should immediately hire a Missoula lawyer who defends Medicare fraud cases. A lawyer can protect your rights, ensure that investigators have not violated your rights, form your defense, aggressively defend you at trial, and negotiate a lesser sentence if you plead guilty.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
The goal of an initial consultation is to find an attorney you are comfortable working with and someone who can help you understand your options under the law. Seek to understand the relevant legal experience the attorney brings to your case. While it is not realistic to expect an attorney to resolve your legal issue during an initial consultation, you should gain a level of comfort with his/her ability to do so. A good consultation can clarify issues, raise pertinent questions and considerations for your case, and help you make an informed decision towards resolving your legal issue.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.