Mortgage Fraud Lawyers | Chicago Office | Serving Schaumburg, IL
Mortgage Fraud Lawyers | Chicago Office | Serving Schaumburg, IL
Mortgage Fraud Lawyers | Oak Brook Office | Serving Schaumburg, IL
Lead Counsel independently verifies Mortgage Fraud attorneys in Schaumburg by conferring with Illinois bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Mortgage loan fraud charges come along with some serious consequences including hefty fines and serious jail time. If you are facing such charges, now is the time to contact a Schaumburg criminal mortgage loan fraud attorney so you can receive the legal advice you need.
Criminal mortgage loan fraud occurs when a person misrepresents or leaves out pertinent information from a mortgage loan application. Obtaining a mortgage based on false information is a serious crime and falls under federal law, though some states are also enacting state laws against this crime as well.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.