Lead Counsel independently verifies Child Support Modification attorneys in Decatur by conferring with Alabama bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
There are different reasons to modify a child support order. Some reasons are temporary and other reasons may be permanent. Temporary modifications may be due to medical and financial hardships, such as a child’s medical emergency. Permanent modifications may be awarded if either parent loses their job, the child’s needs significantly changed or either parent becomes disabled.
You can modify the child support order by increasing or decreasing the amount when changed circumstances have occurred. You must make the request to the Judge by presenting evidence of the changed circumstances. Speaking with a child support modification attorney in will allow you to know whether a certain circumstances can modify a child support order.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
The goal of an initial consultation is to find an attorney you are comfortable working with and someone who can help you understand your options under the law. Seek to understand the relevant legal experience the attorney brings to your case. While it is not realistic to expect an attorney to resolve your legal issue during an initial consultation, you should gain a level of comfort with his/her ability to do so. A good consultation can clarify issues, raise pertinent questions and considerations for your case, and help you make an informed decision towards resolving your legal issue.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.