Lead Counsel independently verifies Child Support Enforcement attorneys in Boston by conferring with Massachusetts bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
In order to avoid child support payments from being defaulted in the future, the court may withhold child support payments in several ways. Depending on the state, a court may offer payment options such as income being withheld, automatic payments through a bank account or credit card, automatic withdrawals from payments. Contact your a Boston child support enforcement attorney to guide you with the various payment options for your state.
Failing to make child support payments, can result in the court attempting to collect defaulted payments. The court can do this by withholding payor’s income or wage garnishments; by denying a passport application until child support payments are made; the court can also impose jail time if payments are continuously avoided. a Boston family lawyer will explain the child support enforcement process in your state.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
Experience. Regardless of the type of legal matter you need help with, an experienced attorney will usually be able to get you better results.
Competence. Determine an attorney’s expertise by asking about their track record for the issue you need help with resolving.
Fit. There are plenty of good attorneys out there; make sure you find one you are comfortable working with.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.