Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
Assisting with Personal Injury Defense issues in Bellerose and across New York.
Free Consultation
Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
Need help with Personal Injury Defense in New York? Rosenbaum & Rosenbaum, PC helps clients in the Bellerose area.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
Choose Arze & Mollica, LLP for qualified Personal Injury Defense representation in the Bellerose, New York area.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
A reputable law firm in Bellerose, New York, Melito & Adolfsen P.C. specializes in helping clients with Personal Injury Defense issues.
Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
Clients needing legal solutions for Personal Injury Defense can connect with Arze & Mollica, LLP, a local New York practice.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
Personal Injury Defense Lawyers | Serving Bellerose, NY
Lead Counsel independently verifies Personal Injury Defense attorneys in Bellerose by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
If you’ve been accused of causing someone else to suffer injuries, you’re facing serious consequences. You may be liable for that person’s medical expenses, property repairs, court costs, and potentially even punitive damages.
In many cases, your insurance company will support you during these particular types of lawsuits. In cases where you don’t have insurance or they won’t/can’t defend you, you should consider speaking with a Bellerose personal injury defense attorney.
He or she will negotiate directly with the injured party and reduce your liability and out-of-pocket expenses. If you are being threatened with a lawsuit, or even if you’ve been sued, talk with an attorney as soon as you are able. The sooner you call, the quicker this event can be behind you.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
The goal of an initial consultation is to find an attorney you are comfortable working with and someone who can help you understand your options under the law. Seek to understand the relevant legal experience the attorney brings to your case. While it is not realistic to expect an attorney to resolve your legal issue during an initial consultation, you should gain a level of comfort with his/her ability to do so. A good consultation can clarify issues, raise pertinent questions and considerations for your case, and help you make an informed decision towards resolving your legal issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.