Lead Counsel independently verifies Minor In Possession attorneys in Franklin by conferring with Tennessee bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
A minor who is caught with possessing drugs or alcohol, even if he or she is not under their influence, has committed a criminal offense. Minor in possession law and its punishments vary from state to state but can lead to serious consequences even into adulthood.
Defending a minor in possession charge can be difficult but certain defenses are available. It is in the best interest of the minor and the parents to immediately consult a Franklin minor in possession attorney. The lawyer can form a defense and present any mitigating factors that may exist.
It is in your best interest to get legal help early on in addressing your situation. There are times when hiring a lawyer quickly is critical to your case, such as if you are charged with a crime. It may also be in your best interest to have a lawyer review the fine print before signing legal documents. A lawyer can also help you get the compensation you deserve if you’ve suffered a serious injury. For issues where money or property is at stake, having a lawyer guide you through the complexities of the legal system can save you time, hassle, and possibly a lot of grief in the long run.
For most consumer legal issues, the size of the practice is much less important than the experience, competence, and reputation of the attorney(s) handling your case. Among the most important factors when choosing an attorney are your comfort level with the attorney or practice and the attorney’s track record in bringing about quick, successful resolutions to cases similar to yours.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.