Lead Counsel independently verifies Medicaid Fraud attorneys in Littleton by conferring with New Hampshire bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Medicaid fraud occurs when a physician, patient, or other perpetrator uses a fake patient or a legitimate Medicaid member to file a false claim, gives or receives a kickback, or bills unethically. In some cases, legitimate but deceived patients may not know they are involved in fraud until it is too late.
If you have been accused of Medicaid fraud, immediately consult with a Littleton defense lawyer who handles Medicaid fraud cases. The lawyer can evaluate your situation, advise you of your legal options and aggressively represent you during an investigation or legal proceeding.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
For most consumer legal issues, the size of the practice is much less important than the experience, competence, and reputation of the attorney(s) handling your case. Among the most important factors when choosing an attorney are your comfort level with the attorney or practice and the attorney’s track record in bringing about quick, successful resolutions to cases similar to yours.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.