Professional Malpractice Lawyers | Chappaqua Office | Serving New York, NY
Auerbach Law Group, P.C. has experience helping clients with their Professional Malpractice needs in New York, New York.
Professional Malpractice Lawyers | White Plains Office | Serving New York, NY
Those confronted with Professional Malpractice issues can connect with Auerbach Law Group, P.C.. This practice offers legal help to clients in the New York, New York area.
Professional Malpractice Lawyers | Peekskill Office | Serving New York, NY
Professional Malpractice Lawyers | Purchase Office | Serving New York, NY
Professional Malpractice Lawyers | White Plains Office | Serving New York, NY
Lead Counsel independently verifies Professional Malpractice attorneys in New York by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
Experience. Regardless of the type of legal matter you need help with, an experienced attorney will usually be able to get you better results.
Competence. Determine an attorney’s expertise by asking about their track record for the issue you need help with resolving.
Fit. There are plenty of good attorneys out there; make sure you find one you are comfortable working with.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.