Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Rocklin Office
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Roseville Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Carmichael Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Folsom Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Carmichael Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Rocklin Office
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Legal Malpractice Lawyers | Sacramento Office | Serving Rocklin, CA
Lead Counsel independently verifies Legal Malpractice attorneys in Rocklin by conferring with California bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
If you believe your lawyer negligently or recklessly represented you in a legal proceeding that resulted in an unfair or unjust outcome, you may have a valid claim of legal malpractice. A Rocklin Legal Malpractice Attorney can help you determine whether you have a case, and help you recover for your losses.
All lawyers are required to act diligently, ethically, and with vigor in their representation of clients. Unfortunately, various and often unforeseen circumstances can cause an attorney’s representation to be less than adequate, which can result in actual harm and damages to a client. This is known as committing legal malpractice.
Common types of legal malpractice include missing court filings, failing to communicate, allowing conflicts of interest to persist, failure to know the law or perform research, misuse of client trust accounts, and client abandonment.
It is in your best interest to get legal help early on in addressing your situation. There are times when hiring a lawyer quickly is critical to your case, such as if you are charged with a crime. It may also be in your best interest to have a lawyer review the fine print before signing legal documents. A lawyer can also help you get the compensation you deserve if you’ve suffered a serious injury. For issues where money or property is at stake, having a lawyer guide you through the complexities of the legal system can save you time, hassle, and possibly a lot of grief in the long run.
The goal of an initial consultation is to find an attorney you are comfortable working with and someone who can help you understand your options under the law. Seek to understand the relevant legal experience the attorney brings to your case. While it is not realistic to expect an attorney to resolve your legal issue during an initial consultation, you should gain a level of comfort with his/her ability to do so. A good consultation can clarify issues, raise pertinent questions and considerations for your case, and help you make an informed decision towards resolving your legal issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.