Lead Counsel independently verifies Identity Theft attorneys in Sparks by conferring with Nevada bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Putting your personal information on the Internet is a recipe for a thief stealing your identity. A perpetrator, emboldened and protected by the anonymity of the Internet, obtains your financial and personal information by trickery or deceit and makes unauthorized purchases or requests for money you believe legitimate.
Correcting the unauthorized use or your personal information can be time consuming and difficult. A Sparks attorney experienced in identity theft cases can help you navigate through the process and protect you from potential liability, possible criminal charges, and salvage your credit rating.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
For most consumer legal issues, the size of the practice is much less important than the experience, competence, and reputation of the attorney(s) handling your case. Among the most important factors when choosing an attorney are your comfort level with the attorney or practice and the attorney’s track record in bringing about quick, successful resolutions to cases similar to yours.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.