Lead Counsel independently verifies Identity Theft attorneys in Enterprise by conferring with Nevada bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Putting your personal information on the Internet is a recipe for a thief stealing your identity. A perpetrator, emboldened and protected by the anonymity of the Internet, obtains your financial and personal information by trickery or deceit and makes unauthorized purchases or requests for money you believe legitimate.
Correcting the unauthorized use or your personal information can be time consuming and difficult. An Enterprise attorney experienced in identity theft cases can help you navigate through the process and protect you from potential liability, possible criminal charges, and salvage your credit rating.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.