Health Insurance Lawyers | Smyrna Office | Serving Harrington, DE
54 Liborio Lane, Smyrna, DE 19977
Health Insurance Lawyers | Dover Office | Serving Harrington, DE
19 South State Street, Suite 100, Dover, DE 19901
Lead Counsel independently verifies Health Insurance attorneys in Harrington and checks their standing with Delaware bar associations.Our Verification Process and Criteria
Has your health insurance claim been denied? If so, a health insurance attorney may be able to help you. Health insurance law has greatly changed within the last few years, especially with the implementation of the affordable care act and the penalties that may be associated with it. A Harrington health insurance lawyer can help you navigate the new law and how to handle any situation that comes up.
With the passing of the affordable care act, most individuals living in the United States must purchase health insurance. It’s important when signing up for new health coverage that you review your policies. If you’re still denied coverage based on previous conditions, you should seek help from a health insurance attorney.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.