Lead Counsel independently verifies Embezzlement attorneys in Pelham by conferring with Alabama bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Stealing money from an employer is embezzlement and the penalties, depending upon the value of what was taken and the jurisdiction, can range from up to a year in county jail and much longer state or federal prison terms. To curtail white collar crimes, embezzlement charges are aggressively prosecuted.
If you are suspected, arrested, or charged with embezzlement you must immediately contact a Pelham embezzlement defense lawyer to protect your rights. Your lawyer can advise you of your legal options, investigate the charges, challenge evidence, and aggressively defend you. If you choose, your lawyer can negotiate a plea.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.