Lead Counsel independently verifies DePuy Hip Replacement attorneys in Kansas City by conferring with Missouri bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
The Depuy hip replacement device, designed to last 10 to 15 years, has experienced a high failure rate occurring within five years and the manufacturer voluntarily recalled the product. Many patients have undergone revision surgery because of the failure and have experienced pain, swelling, and difficulty walking.
If your DePuy hip replacement has failed prematurely, it is in your best interest to consult a Kansas City lawyer who handles DePuy hip replacement cases. The lawyer can tell you if you are entitled to compensation, prepare your claim, and may achieve a settlement that is satisfactory to you instead of going to trial.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
The more experienced a lawyer is in legal practice, the more likely he/she will be able to bring about a successful resolution to your issue. Since experience matters, lawyers who’ve been practicing law for many years (with a successful track record) tend to be in high demand. You should look for information about a lawyer’s experience and ask questions during the initial meeting. It’s a very good idea to ask the lawyer how many years he/she has been practicing law and the expected outcome of your case.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.