Lead Counsel independently verifies Criminal Child Abuse attorneys in South Glens Falls by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
If you are being investigated for child abuse, you are facing potentially losing custody of your child, criminal charges, fines and much more. Depending on the type of alleged abuse, the evidence against you and your personal goals, a South Glens Falls criminal child abuse attorney can help defend you and potentially clear you of these charges.
Criminal child abuse can come in the form of any action that results in hurting or harming a child and not all abuse has to be intentional. Any type of physical or psychological abuse constitutes child abuse, but so does neglect and negligent acts.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.