Lead Counsel independently verifies Construction Accident attorneys in Breckenridge and checks their standing with Colorado bar associations.Our Verification Process and Criteria
Many know that construction work is very dangerous and can lead to accidents and injuries. If you have been injured on a construction job, you may need to take time off of work or you may not be able to continue working. When faced with debilitating injuries, you will need workers’ compensation and other financial recovery options to help you through the healing process.
A Breckenridge construction job accident attorney will take on the task of helping you recover for your injuries so that you can just focus on getting better. He or she can investigate your case for all potential recovery options and help you file a workers’ comp claim.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
Bill by the hour: Many attorneys bill by the hour. How much an attorney bills you per hour will vary based on a number of factors. For instance, an attorney’s hourly fee may fluctuate based on whether that hour is spent representing you in court or doing research on your case. Attorneys in one practice area may bill you more than attorneys in a different practice area.
Contingent fee: Some lawyers will accept payment via contingent fee. In this arrangement, the lawyer receives a percentage of the total monetary recovery if you win your lawsuit. In sum, the lawyer only gets paid if you win. Contingent fee agreements are limited to specific practice areas in civil law.
Flat fee: For “routine” legal work where the attorney generally knows the amount of time and resources necessary to complete the task, he/she may be willing to bill you a flat fee for services performed.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.