3450 N. Triumph Blvd, Suite 102-161, Lehi, UT 84043
Other Nearby Offices
Kristopher K. Greenwood & Associates represents clients in Child Custody cases in the Payson, Utah area.
Child Custody Lawyers | Provo Office | Serving Payson, UT
3651 North 100 East, Suite 300, Provo, UT 84604
Child Custody Lawyers | Lehi Office | Serving Payson, UT
471 W 4100 N, Lehi, UT 84043
Child Custody Lawyers | Orem Office | Serving Payson, UT
1345 W. 1600 N., Suite 201, Orem, UT 84057
Child Custody Lawyers | Lehi Office | Serving Payson, UT
51 E Main Street, Lehi, UT 84043
Child Custody Lawyers | Lehi Office | Serving Payson, UT
770 E Main Street, Suite 348, Lehi, UT 84043
Child Custody Lawyers | Orem Office | Serving Payson, UT
1431 S 550 East, Suite 2, Orem, UT 84097
Child Custody Lawyers | Provo Office | Serving Payson, UT
75 S 300 W, Provo, UT 84601
Child Custody Lawyers | Lehi Office | Serving Payson, UT
3451 N Triumph, Suite 206, Lehi, UT 84043
Child Custody Lawyers | Provo Office | Serving Payson, UT
120 East 300 North, Provo, UT 84606
Child Custody Lawyers | Provo Office | Serving Payson, UT
90 North 100 East, PO Box 888, Provo, UT 84603
Child Custody Lawyers | Provo Office | Serving Payson, UT
4844 N 300 W., Suite 300, Provo, UT 84604
Child Custody Lawyers | Lehi Office | Serving Payson, UT
2600 West Executive Parkway, Thanksgiving Park Four, Suite 400, Lehi, UT 84043
Child Custody Lawyers | Provo Office | Serving Payson, UT
2525 N Canyon Rd, Provo, UT 84604
Child Custody Lawyers | Spanish Fork Office | Serving Payson, UT
51 East 800 North, Spanish Fork, UT 84660
Child Custody Lawyers | Lehi Office | Serving Payson, UT
3301 N. Thanksgiving Way, Suite 400, Lehi, UT 84043
Lead Counsel independently verifies Child Custody attorneys in Payson and checks their standing with Utah bar associations.
Our Verification Process and CriteriaAchieving custody of a child can be a highly emotional battle between parents. Add to that a number of legal issues courts weigh to award custody and child custody cases can become daunting. This area of law significantly impacts the child’s present well being and future.
In determining who gets custody, courts consider what is in the “best interest” of the child, which is a broad term that does not have a fixed standard and can take into account a number of considerations. Child custody law is complex, so to get the best result obtaining the services of a qualified Payson attorney who practices child custody law is imperative.
Specialized legal help is available for most legal issues. Each case is unique; seeking legal help is a smart first step toward understanding your legal situation and seeking the best path toward resolution for your case. An experienced lawyer understands the local laws surrounding your case and what your best legal options might be. More importantly, there are certain situations and circumstances – such as being charged with a crime – where you should always seek experienced legal help.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
Bill by the hour: Many attorneys bill by the hour. How much an attorney bills you per hour will vary based on a number of factors. For instance, an attorney’s hourly fee may fluctuate based on whether that hour is spent representing you in court or doing research on your case. Attorneys in one practice area may bill you more than attorneys in a different practice area.
Contingent fee: Some lawyers will accept payment via contingent fee. In this arrangement, the lawyer receives a percentage of the total monetary recovery if you win your lawsuit. In sum, the lawyer only gets paid if you win. Contingent fee agreements are limited to specific practice areas in civil law.
Flat fee: For “routine” legal work where the attorney generally knows the amount of time and resources necessary to complete the task, he/she may be willing to bill you a flat fee for services performed.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.