Lead Counsel independently verifies Arbitration attorneys in Moody and checks their standing with Alabama bar associations.Our Verification Process and Criteria
A cost-effective alternative to settle a dispute without a trial is arbitration. Disputes are resolved by an impartial third party, who presides over an arbitration hearing at which each side presents its case. The arbitrator is chosen by the participants, who agree to accept the arbitrators’ decision.
You may enter arbitration without legal counsel, but using a Moody lawyer to help you prepare for the hearing can make a difference in the outcome. The lawyer can review the legalities of the dispute, guide you through the arbitration procedure, and prepare the terms of arbitration and other documents.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
The goal of an initial consultation is to find an attorney you are comfortable working with and someone who can help you understand your options under the law. Seek to understand the relevant legal experience the attorney brings to your case. While it is not realistic to expect an attorney to resolve your legal issue during an initial consultation, you should gain a level of comfort with his/her ability to do so. A good consultation can clarify issues, raise pertinent questions and considerations for your case, and help you make an informed decision towards resolving your legal issue.
The more experienced a lawyer is in legal practice, the more likely he/she will be able to bring about a successful resolution to your issue. Since experience matters, lawyers who’ve been practicing law for many years (with a successful track record) tend to be in high demand. You should look for information about a lawyer’s experience and ask questions during the initial meeting. It’s a very good idea to ask the lawyer how many years he/she has been practicing law and the expected outcome of your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.