Lead Counsel independently verifies Arbitration attorneys in Blountsville and checks their standing with Alabama bar associations.Our Verification Process and Criteria
A cost-effective alternative to settle a dispute without a trial is arbitration. Disputes are resolved by an impartial third party, who presides over an arbitration hearing at which each side presents its case. The arbitrator is chosen by the participants, who agree to accept the arbitrators’ decision.
You may enter arbitration without legal counsel, but using a Blountsville lawyer to help you prepare for the hearing can make a difference in the outcome. The lawyer can review the legalities of the dispute, guide you through the arbitration procedure, and prepare the terms of arbitration and other documents.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.