One South Church Avenue, Suite 2100, Tucson, AZ 85701
Other Nearby Offices
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP has experience helping clients with their Antitrust needs in Tucson, Arizona.
Se Habla Español
Free Consultation
Antitrust Lawyers | Tucson Office
333 North Wilmot, Suite 303, Tucson, AZ 85711
Antitrust Lawyers | Tucson Office
1 S. Church Avenue, Suite 2000, Tucson, AZ 85701
Antitrust Lawyers | Tucson Office
1 South Church Avenue, Suite 1500, Tucson, AZ 85701
Lead Counsel independently verifies Antitrust attorneys in Tucson and checks their standing with Arizona bar associations.
Our Verification Process and CriteriaAntitrust attorneys can help protect you from predatory business practices. Skilled antitrust attorneys work to protect ordinary consumers from several questionable business practices, including price fixing, bid rigging, and market allocation. Antitrust attorneys are also knowledgeable when it comes to laws pertaining to mergers and acquisitions.
Antitrust laws regulate businesses and these laws work to promote fair and free competition. Generally, Antitrust law is used to outlaw monopolies in the marketplace, but it can also be used to regulate merge corporations and ban deceptive business practices.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
The more experienced a lawyer is in legal practice, the more likely he/she will be able to bring about a successful resolution to your issue. Since experience matters, lawyers who’ve been practicing law for many years (with a successful track record) tend to be in high demand. You should look for information about a lawyer’s experience and ask questions during the initial meeting. It’s a very good idea to ask the lawyer how many years he/she has been practicing law and the expected outcome of your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.