Animal Attack Lawyers | Pine Bluff Office | Serving Star City, AR
501 Main Street, 11th Floor, PO Box 8509, Pine Bluff, AR 71611
Animal Attack Lawyers | Pine Bluff Office | Serving Star City, AR
315 East 8th Avenue, PO Box 7808, Pine Bluff, AR 71611
Animal Attack Lawyers | Pine Bluff Office | Serving Star City, AR
301 E 6th Ave, Pine Bluff, AR 71601
Lead Counsel independently verifies Animal Attack attorneys in Star City and checks their standing with Arkansas bar associations.
Our Verification Process and CriteriaAnimal attacks by domesticated or dangerous animals kept as pets, which can be severe and even life threatening, are a patchwork of city and county ordinances and state law assigning liability to the animal’s owner for the injuries sustained. In some cases, criminal law may also apply.
Most states are strict liability jurisdictions, meaning the person who owns or controls the animal is liable to the victim unless the animal’s owner has a valid defense, such as a third party let the animal loose without the owner’s knowledge or consent. A Star City animal attack attorney can advise you if you are entitled to compensation.
Specialized legal help is available for most legal issues. Each case is unique; seeking legal help is a smart first step toward understanding your legal situation and seeking the best path toward resolution for your case. An experienced lawyer understands the local laws surrounding your case and what your best legal options might be. More importantly, there are certain situations and circumstances – such as being charged with a crime – where you should always seek experienced legal help.
For most consumer legal issues, the size of the practice is much less important than the experience, competence, and reputation of the attorney(s) handling your case. Among the most important factors when choosing an attorney are your comfort level with the attorney or practice and the attorney’s track record in bringing about quick, successful resolutions to cases similar to yours.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.