Alternative Dispute Resolution Lawyers | Opelika Office
PO Box 2069, Opelika, AL 36803-2069
Alternative Dispute Resolution Lawyers | Opelika Office
3120 Frederick Road, Suite B, PO Drawer 2268, Opelika, AL 36803
Alternative Dispute Resolution Lawyers | Auburn Office | Serving Opelika, AL
PO Box 430, Auburn, AL 36831
Lead Counsel independently verifies Alternative Dispute Resolution attorneys in Opelika and checks their standing with Alabama bar associations.
Our Verification Process and CriteriaAlternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a process by which the parties can resolve their situation without going to court. The process typically involves several methods including arbitration, mediation, early neutral evaluation, collaborative law, and conciliation.
It is not necessary to have legal counsel for ADR proceedings, but it is a good idea to consult with an Opelika lawyer who is experienced in these forms of negotiation to protect your rights. The lawyer can advise you how to avoid potential misunderstandings and act as an advisor.
Specialized legal help is available for most legal issues. Each case is unique; seeking legal help is a smart first step toward understanding your legal situation and seeking the best path toward resolution for your case. An experienced lawyer understands the local laws surrounding your case and what your best legal options might be. More importantly, there are certain situations and circumstances – such as being charged with a crime – where you should always seek experienced legal help.
Experience. Regardless of the type of legal matter you need help with, an experienced attorney will usually be able to get you better results.
Competence. Determine an attorney’s expertise by asking about their track record for the issue you need help with resolving.
Fit. There are plenty of good attorneys out there; make sure you find one you are comfortable working with.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.