Zoloft is an anti-depressant to treat clinical depression and several disorders, including obsessive compulsive, panic, post-traumatic stress, social anxiety and pre-menstrual dysphoric. However, the drug has several side effects, including suicide, withdrawals, premature births, and persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns.
Drug cases are complex, so consulting with an Irvington lawyer experienced in handling Zoloft cases is imperative. The lawyer will assess your circumstances to determine if you are entitled to compensation. He or she can form your case, file a lawsuit against the manufacturer, and may be able to reach a settlement.
Specialized legal help is available for most legal issues. Each case is unique; seeking legal help is a smart first step toward understanding your legal situation and seeking the best path toward resolution for your case. An experienced lawyer understands the local laws surrounding your case and what your best legal options might be. More importantly, there are certain situations and circumstances – such as being charged with a crime – where you should always seek experienced legal help.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.