Spinal Cord Injury Lawyers | Livingston Office
101 North E. Street, PO Box 953, Livingston, MT 59047
Lead Counsel independently verifies Spinal Cord Injury attorneys in Livingston and checks their standing with Montana bar associations.Our Verification Process and Criteria
An injury to the spinal cord, the bundle of nerves residing in the backbone, can result in the loss of motor control and sensation, it can render the injured person fully or partly paralyzed, and can do permanent and serious harm to bodily functions, such as breathing.
Is you have suffered a spinal cord injury, it is in your best interest to consult a Livingston lawyer. He or she can analyze the facts of the event, assess the strength of your case and the amount of compensation. The attorney can take your case to trial or try and seek a satisfactory settlement.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.