Lead Counsel independently verifies Pradaxa attorneys in Centereach by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Pradaxa is prescribed to patients who have a common type of heart rhythm abnormality termed AF (non-valvular atrial fibrillation) to reduce the risk of stroke and blood clotting. However, Pradaxa has been linked to excessive bleeding that can be fatal.
You may have a case against the drug maker or distributors if you have taken Pradaxa and suffered one or more of its side effects, including sever or uncontrollable bleeding, coughing up blood, blood clots, and unusual bleeding from the gums. An attorney experienced in Pradaxa lawsuits and the pharmaceutical industry can determine if your situation warrants legal action.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.