Lead Counsel independently verifies Loan Modification attorneys in Duluth by conferring with Georgia bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
A mortgage loan workout, also called a mortgage modification, is a plan detailing how to restructure a home loan when the homeowner is facing foreclosure. Lenders consider the seriousness of the hardship, the balance of the loan, earned equity, and the borrower’s future financial prospects. Lenders may lower the interest rate or extend the loan.
If you are considering a mortgage loan workout you should first consult a Duluth lawyer who handles workout cases. The lawyer can guide you through the workout process, advise you about your alternatives, such as a short sale, negotiate with the lender and protect your interests.
It is in your best interest to get legal help early on in addressing your situation. There are times when hiring a lawyer quickly is critical to your case, such as if you are charged with a crime. It may also be in your best interest to have a lawyer review the fine print before signing legal documents. A lawyer can also help you get the compensation you deserve if you’ve suffered a serious injury. For issues where money or property is at stake, having a lawyer guide you through the complexities of the legal system can save you time, hassle, and possibly a lot of grief in the long run.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.