Lead Counsel independently verifies Loan Modification attorneys in Opelika by conferring with Alabama bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
A mortgage loan workout, also called a mortgage modification, is a plan detailing how to restructure a home loan when the homeowner is facing foreclosure. Lenders consider the seriousness of the hardship, the balance of the loan, earned equity, and the borrower’s future financial prospects. Lenders may lower the interest rate or extend the loan.
If you are considering a mortgage loan workout you should first consult an Opelika lawyer who handles workout cases. The lawyer can guide you through the workout process, advise you about your alternatives, such as a short sale, negotiate with the lender and protect your interests.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
A reputable attorney will be very upfront about how he/she will charge you. The three most common fee structures that attorneys use to charge for their services are:
Depending on your specific legal situation, it’s possible that only one type of fee structure is available. For instance, criminal defense attorneys almost always bill by the hour. In a flat fee arrangement, an attorney accepts a one-time payment to help you resolve your issue. With a contingent fee agreement, the client pays little to nothing upfront and the attorney receives a percentage of the money recovered if you win your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.