Shawn Perry

Perry & Perry PLLP

Business Lawyer | Serving Minneapolis, MN

Free Consultation

1660 Highway 100 South , Suite 336
Minneapolis, MN 55416

Accomplished. Experienced. Helpful.

The family-owned law practice of Perry & Perry, PLLP has been serving clients in the greater Minneapolis area for well over four decades. Since 1962, Perry & Perry, PLLP has served as a reliable, capable legal partner for Minneapolis families and small businesses. We maintain a friendly demeanor around the office, but we don’t mess around in the courtroom. Let us show you what a difference experienced, professional legal representation can make.

With more than five decades’ experience in taking on tough business disputes, our firm stands ready to help you protect your rights and your assets, regardless of which side of the courtroom you find yourself on. We regularly handle cases involving employee contracts and disputes, shareholder contracts and disputes, and other civil matters on behalf of Minneapolis business owners, and we encourage you to contact us if you are a party to a possible or actual litigation.

Contact us today if you need legal assistance with any of the following:

  • Business Law
  • Civil Litigation
  • Personal Injury
  • Criminal Defense
  • Family Law
  • Employment Law
  • Intellectual Property Law

Any attorney can tell you they’ll win your case for you, but simply sporting a good attitude doesn’t mean that someone’s a good lawyer. We don’t give legal advice until we’re confident we understand the details of our clients’ cases and come up with a plan that’s tailored to their specific needs. Choose a legal partner who’s willing to put themselves in your shoes and go to bat for you to help you achieve a favorable outcome — choose the family-owned Minneapolis firm of Perry & Perry, PLLP. Call Perry & Perry, PLLP today at 952-546-3555 to arrange your free initial consultation.

Attorney Shane C. Perry

Bar Admissions:

  • Minnesota

Education:

  • William Mitchell College of Law, J.D. (1989)
  • University of Minnesota, B.A. (1985)

Professional Memberships and Achievements:

  • Minnesota Supreme Court (1989)
  • United States District Court, District of Minnesota (1994)
  • Shakopee Mdewakaton Sioux (Dakota) Tribal Court (2001)
  • United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Pro Hac Vice (2010)

Attorney Shawn M. Perry

Bar Admissions:

  • Minnesota State Bar Association

Education:

  • William Mitchell College of Law, J.D.
    • magna cum laude (1987)
  • University of Minnesota — B.A. (1983)

Professional Memberships and Achievements:

  • Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent Rating 5/5.0
  • Minnesota Supreme Court (1987)
  • United States District Court, District of Minnesota (1988)
  • United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit (1998)
  • United States District Court, District of Michigan (1994)
  • United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Pro Hac Vice (2005)
  • United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Pro Hac Vice (2006)
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Washington, D.C. (2006)
  • United States District Court, District of Nevada, Pro Hac Vice (2007)
  • United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Pro Hac Vice (2009)
  • Clark County District Court, Las Vegas, Nevada, Pro Hac Vice (2010)
  • United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington, Pro Hac Vice (2011)
  • United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin (2012)
  • United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Pro Hac Vice (2012)
  • United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Pro Hac Vice (2012)
  • United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana (2013)
  • United States District Court, District of Nevada, Pro Hac Vice (2013)
  • United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas (2013)
  • Delaware Court of Chancery, Pro Hac Vice, (2015)

Business Litigation

  • Confidential settlement in a breach of contract case filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan) for a telecommunications agent against AT&T Corp., which, after four years of litigation, settled on a confidential basis days before the trial was scheduled.
  • $4.5 Million settlement in an ERISA class action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota against MoneyGram International, Inc. for losses to employees who invested in the company’s 401(k) Plan.
  • Obtained a $533,537 judgment in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in a securities fraud case for clients who invested in an exotic car dealership located in the Caesar’s Palace Forum Shops in Las Vegas, Nevada.
  • Obtained a $482,972 judgment in Hennepin County District Court regarding a construction dispute over the remodeling of a home brought by a general contractor against a notable NFL football player.
  • Obtained a $541,512 judgment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas) against a biofuel processor in a breach of contract action.
  • Obtained an arbitration award of $359,396 in favor of client and successfully defended a counterclaim brought against client in excess of $2 million. The same proceeding involved the installation and customization of Oracle software by our client for a multinational firm headquartered in Italy.
  • Multiple confidential settlements in pre-litigation matters and seven lawsuits filed in federal courts in multiple jurisdictions to enforce our client’s technology patent.
  • Confidential settlement in a fraudulent transfer and piercing the corporate veil case to enforce a $1,915,058 judgment in Hennepin County District Court after litigating four separate cases over a seven-year period.
  • $14,435,243 judgment following a court trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery as co-counsel in a shareholder appraisal action for minority shareholders in a bank holding company located in Pennsylvania in a dispute over the value of the stock.
  • $218,055 default judgment in the United States Court for the District of Minnesota against a Chinese counterfeiter who was infringing client’s patents and registered trademark.

Get a Free Consultation


Captcha Image