Dimitri Dube, PC

Federal Criminal Law Lawyers | Serving Philadelphia, PA

Free Consultation

1515 Market Street , Suite 1200
Philadelphia, PA 19103

We Work Hard to Win for You

Have you been arrested or accused of a federal crime? If so, you need counsel who knows his way around the federal courthouse. Dimitri Dube, P.C. is a full service criminal, personal injury, civil rights, and business litigation law firm. Our founder, Dimitri Dube, is a former federal law clerk, who has represented and won cases for CEOs and Fortune 500 companies. Dimitri has also represented and won cases for death row prisoners, criminal defendants, and victims of police brutality.

Dimitri Dube founded this law firm on the principle that every client--whether a CEO or death row prisoner--deserves honest, hard-working, and intelligent lawyers who will employ outstanding legal skill and innovative thinking to solve their problems.

Our mission is to serve, protect, and win for you. We do so by listening to you to determine your needs and then advocate for you forcefully with prosecutors, opposing counsel, judges, and juries. 

Contact us today if you need legal assistance with any of the following:

  • Healthcare Fraud
  • Drug Crimes
  • Hobbs Act
  • Immigration Fraud
  • Money laundering
  • Robbery
  • Mail Fraud
  • Wire Fraud
  • Embezzlement
  • Federal Appeals
  • Mortgage Fraud
  • Pill Mill

If you are facing federal charges, you need a smart and dedicated lawyer on your side. Dimitri is a skillful trial lawyer and litigator. He will make the arguments to help you. Dimitri has gotten federal cases dismissed, negotiated lesser charges, and successfully convinced judges to sentence his federal clients to probation or downward variances for less time than recommended by the sentencing guidelines.

Call attorney Dimitri Dube today at 215-664-6907 to arrange your free initial consultation.

Attorney Profile

Attorney Dimitri Dube


  • Pennsylvania, 2006
  • Texas. 2009
  • Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
  • Texas Eastern District Court
  • Texas Northern District Court 


  • New York University School of Law, J.D., 2005
    • McKay Scholar, Petluck-Poses Prize for Trial Advocacy
  • University of Pennsylvania, B.S., 2002
    • Cum laude
    • Major: Biology 
    • Senior Honor Award 

Professional Memberships and Achievements:

  • Admission to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
  • State Bar of Texas, member
  • Pennsylvania State Bar, member

Verdicts & Settlements


United States v. Washington: Dimitri obtained a dismissal of this federal drug conspiracy case, where the defendant was a possible career offender who faced up to life in prison.

United States v. Henderson: Defendant was charged with social security fraud, and originally faced up to 5 years imprisonment. The case was dismissed after the client successfully completed pretrial diversion that Dimitri successfully negotiated.

Lesser Charges

United States v. Heath: Defendant was originally indicted for bank fraud and faced a recommended sentence of more than 10 years. Dimitri successfully negotiated lesser charges and client received only 2 years.

United States v. [Undisclosed]: Defendant faced a recommended sentence of 9 years for theft and identity theft. Dimitri successfully negotiated lesser charges and client now faces less than a year imprisonment.

United States v. [Undisclosed]: Defendant originally faced a sentence of 10 years for drug charges. Dimitri negotiated lesser charges and client now faces less than 2 years in prison.


United States v. Hooks: Defendant faced 3 year recommended sentence for importing drugs into a federal prison. Dimitri convinced the judge to sentence client to Probation at sentencing.

United States v. Mitchell: Client initially faced a felony charge for health care fraud. Dimitri successfully negotiated a misdemeanor charge and a sentence of probation.

United States v. Moreno: Defendant was charged with immigration fraud. Dimitri convinced the federal judge to grant a downward variance to sentence his client to probation.

Lesser Sentences By Fighting the Guidelines

United States v. Gonzalez: Client faced a mandatory minimum of 5 years in prison. Dimitri won an objection with a rare and novel argument. Client received 3 years in prison.

United States v. Garcia: Defendant faced a recommended sentence above the statutory maximum of 20 years. Dimitri won a downward variance and client sentenced to 10 years.

United States v. McMahan: Defendant was charged with federal drug conspiracy. Dimitri was able to win an objection during his sentencing, and reduced his sentence by 2 years.

United States v. Craven: Defendant was charged for mail theft and faced a recommended of 3 years. Defendant was able to obtain a below guideline sentence of time-served (14 months). 

Get a Free Consultation

Captcha Image