GM Ignition Switch Lawyers | Serving Hopewell Junction, NY
Need help with GM Ignition Switch in New York? Finz & Finz, P.C. helps clients in the Hopewell Junction area.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
GM Ignition Switch Lawyers | Serving Hopewell Junction, NY
Finz & Finz, P.C. has experience helping clients with their GM Ignition Switch needs in Hopewell Junction, New York.
Free Consultation
Se Habla Español
GM Ignition Switch Lawyers | Serving Hopewell Junction, NY
GM Ignition Switch Lawyers | Serving Hopewell Junction, NY
Lead Counsel independently verifies GM Ignition Switch attorneys in Hopewell Junction by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
General Motors, or GM for short, is the car manufacturer who just recently began to recall cars due to a defective ignition switch problem that could cause the air bags to not deploy. The ignition switch problem has been linked to severe injuries and even death.
If you or someone you know has been affected by an issue with the GM ignition switch defect, a skilled lawyer will be able to review your case and discuss your options. The time to act is now, before it is too late.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.