Lead Counsel independently verifies Foster Care Abuse attorneys in Portland by conferring with Oregon bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Across the nation an increasing number of children in foster homes are mistreated by foster parents or other children in the home. If you are a victim of foster care abuse, contact a Portland foster care abuse attorney immediately. No one in foster care deserves to suffer abuse in any form.
Attorneys who handle foster care abuse cases understand what you have been through and can explain to you what your legal options are. Depending on the circumstances of your particular abuse case, you may be able to sue the foster care parents, the state entity that put into foster care or some other responsible party. You may be able to recover for physical as well as emotional injuries.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
The more experienced a lawyer is in legal practice, the more likely he/she will be able to bring about a successful resolution to your issue. Since experience matters, lawyers who’ve been practicing law for many years (with a successful track record) tend to be in high demand. You should look for information about a lawyer’s experience and ask questions during the initial meeting. It’s a very good idea to ask the lawyer how many years he/she has been practicing law and the expected outcome of your case.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.