Lead Counsel independently verifies Environmental Exposure attorneys in Mineola by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Environmental exposure is the repeated contact with pollutants and hazardous wastes at home or in the workplace. Such exposure can cause serious ailments and illnesses and possibly death. Both federal and state governments have laws regulating the use and disposal of environmental dangers.
If you have been harmed by exposure to environmental pollutants or hazardous wastes you may be entitled to compensation. To determine if you have a viable case it is necessary to consult with a Mineola environmental exposure lawyer who handles these types of cases often. The lawyer can build and pursue your case for a percentage of the award achieved.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
Experience. Regardless of the type of legal matter you need help with, an experienced attorney will usually be able to get you better results.
Competence. Determine an attorney’s expertise by asking about their track record for the issue you need help with resolving.
Fit. There are plenty of good attorneys out there; make sure you find one you are comfortable working with.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.