Lead Counsel independently verifies Energy Drink attorneys in Great Neck by conferring with New York bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Energy drinks containing large amounts of caffeine and other additives stimulate the nervous and cardiovascular systems and increase blood pressure and heart valve rates. These drinks can increase the risk of consumers who have cardiovascular disease or undiagnosed cardiovascular conditions.
Energy drinks are often labeled as dietary supplements and are not regulated by the FDA. There have been claims that the caffeine content may cause risk in some. Those who consumed energy drinks and believe they were harmed by them may be entitled to compensation. It is advisable to contact a Great Neck energy drink lawyer to determine if a valid case exists.
Specialized legal help is available for most legal issues. Each case is unique; seeking legal help is a smart first step toward understanding your legal situation and seeking the best path toward resolution for your case. An experienced lawyer understands the local laws surrounding your case and what your best legal options might be. More importantly, there are certain situations and circumstances – such as being charged with a crime – where you should always seek experienced legal help.
An attorney consultation should provide you with enough information so that you can make an informed decision on whether to proceed with legal help.
Pro se – This Latin term refers to representing yourself in court instead of hiring professional legal counsel. Pro se representation can occur in either criminal or civil cases.
Statute – Refers to a law created by a legislative body. For example, the laws enacted by Congress are statutes.
Subject matter jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority to hear the claim based on the specific type of issue brought to the court. For example, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court only has subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy filings, therefore it does not have the authority to render binding judgment over other types of cases, such as divorce.