Lead Counsel independently verifies Employment Tax attorneys in Tucson by conferring with Arizona bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Employers are required to withhold federal taxes for their employees, including Social Security taxes, and deposit that money and pay a matching amount to the Internal Revenue Service. Failure to do so has serious consequences. The IRS can close the business, file a tax lien, freeze its credit, and assess penalties and interest.
Tax trouble can be devastating so you should consult with a Tucson lawyer experienced handling employment tax cases. The lawyer can explain the law and help you steer through volumes of tax code, prepare the necessary documents, guide you through IRS’s procedures, and aggressively represent you.
No matter what your legal issue may be, it is always best to seek legal help early in the process. An attorney can help secure what is likely to be the best possible outcome for your situation and avoid both unnecessary complications or errors.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
For most consumer legal issues, the size of the practice is much less important than the experience, competence, and reputation of the attorney(s) handling your case. Among the most important factors when choosing an attorney are your comfort level with the attorney or practice and the attorney’s track record in bringing about quick, successful resolutions to cases similar to yours.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.