Lead Counsel independently verifies Drunk Driving Record Expungement attorneys in Valley by conferring with Alabama bar associations and conducting annual reviews to confirm that an attorney practices in their advertised practice areas and possesses a valid bar license for the appropriate jurisdictions.
Drunk driving convictions can ruin the chance to get a good job, rent a home, can raise insurance rates, and cause embarrassment. But in certain situations a drunk driving conviction can be erased so only law enforcement officials will know about it in a process called expungement.
States have varying criteria for expunging a drunk driving conviction. Retaining a Valley lawyer who handles drunk driving record expungement cases will ensure you have the best result possible. The lawyer knows the required criteria, can assist you in preparing your expungement petition and represent you at the expungement hearing.
In legal practice, experience matters. An experienced attorney will likely have handled issues similar to yours many, many times. Therefore, after listening to your situation, the attorney should have a reasonable idea of the time line for a case like yours and the likely resolution.
An experienced lawyer should be able to communicate a basic “road map” on how to proceed. The lawyer should be able to walk you through the anticipated process, key considerations, and potential pitfalls to avoid. Once you’ve laid out the facts of your situation to the lawyer, he/she should be able to frame expectations and likely scenarios to help you understand your legal issue.
Experience. Regardless of the type of legal matter you need help with, an experienced attorney will usually be able to get you better results.
Competence. Determine an attorney’s expertise by asking about their track record for the issue you need help with resolving.
Fit. There are plenty of good attorneys out there; make sure you find one you are comfortable working with.
Personal jurisdiction – Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court’s reach in personal jurisdiction.