Legal Simplified - Lawyers Verified

Call for Litigation Excellence

Jones & Keller, P.C. is dedicated to making the world safe for competition, one client and case at a time. The firm represents clients in antitrust investigations and litigation before federal, state and administrative tribunals, from the trial through the highest appellate levels.

Attorney Thomas McMahon has won multi-million dollar lawsuits for plaintiffs and defendants at the trial and highest appellate levels of the federal and state judicial and administrative systems in Colorado and elsewhere around the country. Mr. McMahon has successfully handled virtually all types of competition-related issues under federal and state antitrust laws -- including successfully arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court. He also handles healthcare business and litigation cases.

Contact Jones & Keller, P.C. today if you need legal assistance with any of the following:

  • Conspiracies in restraint of trade
  • Bid-rigging
  • Boycotting
  • Exclusive dealing
  • Horizontal and vertical market allocation
  • Price fixing
  • Resale price maintenance
  • Tying arrangements
  • Mergers
  • Monopolies
  • Attempt to monopolize
  • Conspiracy to monopolize
  • Essential facility doctrine
  • Monopolization
  • Monopoly leveraging
  • Predatory pricing and price discrimination
  • Unfair and deceptive trade acts and practices
  • Unfair methods of competition

Call 303-785-1617 today to arrange your initial consultation.

Attorney Profile

Attorney Thomas P. Mcmahon

Jurisdictions:

  • Federal Courts
    • U.S. Supreme Court (1981)
    • U.S. Court of Military Appeals (1972)
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit (1980)
    • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (2001)
    • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan (1971)
    • U.S. District Court, District of Colorado (1976)
    • U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (1988)
  • State Courts
  • State Courts of Michigan (1971)
  • Supreme Court of Colorado (1976)

Professional Memberships and Achievements:

  • American Bar Association -- Antitrust Law Section: Vice-Chair, State Antitrust Enforcement Committee (1992-95); Member (1990-present), Colorado Bar Association
  • Antitrust Subsection, Business Law Section: Chairman (1991-93); Member (1990-present)
  • National Association of Attorneys General Antitrust Multi-State Task Force
  • Vice-Chair, Policy/Publications (1988-89); Member (1981-89), American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (1987-89)
  • Member, Bid Analysis and Management System Users Contract Monitoring Technical Advisory Group, (1987-89)

Case Results

  • Tom McMahon and fellow Jones & Keller trial attorney Steve Long recently won a major jury verdict on behalf of Tom’s client, Auraria Student Housing at the Regency, LLC (the “Regency”). The lawsuit charged that the defendant, Campus Village Apartments, LLC (“Campus Village”), conspired with the University of Colorado Denver (“UCD”) to monopolize the rental to UCD freshmen of privately-owned and operated off-campus student housing in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
  • Following 4½ days of testimony, the Denver federal court jury returned its verdict in the unheard-of span of 48 minutes. After being trebled pursuant to federal antitrust law, the judgment amounts to $9,783,000. In addition, the Regency is entitled to a statutorily-mandated award of attorneys’ fees and costs of suit, which will add significantly to the Regency’s total recovery.
  • Click on jury awards $3.3 million regency cu-Denver for the Denver Post’s article on the case.
  • Tom acted as antitrust counsel on behalf of a Butte, Montana radiologist in a lawsuit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, leading to a $4 million recovery. Cole v. St. James Healthcare Sys., No. DV-07-44 (Mont. 2d Jud. Dist. Ct. 2010).
  • Tom served as antitrust and co-lead counsel on behalf of a St. Joseph, Missouri heart surgeon in a lawsuit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, leading to a $1 million recovery. Clinch v. Heartland Reg'l. Med. Ctr., 03CV72021 (Buchanan Cty. Cir. Ct. 2006).
  • Tom successfully defended a small high-technology company against a would-be class action on behalf of millions of drivers' license holders seeking upwards of potentially billions of dollars in penalties and damages. Miller v. Image Data, LLC, 91 Fed.Appx. 122, 2004 WL 326998 (10th Cir. 2004).
  • Tom represented a Colorado Springs, Colorado heart surgeon in a civil rights suit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, obtaining a $5 million recovery. Morris v. Colo. Spgs. Mem'l Hosp., 99-MK-989 (D. Colo. 2003).
  • Tom served as antitrust and local counsel for the national plaintiffs' class in an antitrust action against a manufacturer of wide-format commercial ink-jet printers and cartridges, resulting in a class recovery valued in the millions of dollars. Colour Editions, Inc., d/b/a King Kolor v. Encad, Inc., 98-D-2490 (D. Colo. 2000).
  • Tom represented a small medical products company that had been excluded by the two dominant firms from competing in the national marketplace for certain handheld surgical devices, obtaining a $4.5 million recovery. BEAL Corp. Liquidating Trust v. Valleylab Inc., 927 F. Supp. 1350 (D. Colo. 1996).
  • Tom served as co-lead class counsel in a national securities fraud class action stemming from a defaulted Colorado special district bond issue, resulting in the recovery of $7.3 million on behalf bondholders nationwide. Abrams v. Southeastern Municipal Bonds, Inc., [1991 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶96,055 (D. Colo. 1991), [1990-91 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶95,757 (D. Colo. 1990).
  • As Chief of the Colorado Attorney General's Antitrust Unit, Tom served as lead counsel for the State of Colorado in a national antitrust class action against insurors, ultimately resulting in a multi-million dollar recovery. In re Ins. Antitrust Litig., 723 F. Supp. 464 (N.D. Calif. 1989), rev'd, 938 F.2d 919 (9th Cir. 1991), aff'd in part, rev'd in part sub nom. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 113 S. Ct. 2891 (1993).
  • While Chief of the Colorado Attorney General's Antitrust Unit, Tom represented the State of Colorado in an antitrust suit against a national highway contractor, obtaining a $1.575 million recovery. Colorado v. Peter Kiewit Sons. Co., 84-Z-1225 (D. Colo. 1987).
  • While Chief of the Colorado Antitrust Unit, Tom successfully represented the State of Colorado and 22 other amici states before the U.S. Supreme Court in a landmark antitrust case pertaining to state action immunity. Community Commc'ns Co. v. City of Boulder, 455 U.S. 40 (1981).
  • Tom acted as antitrust counsel on behalf of a Butte, Montana radiologist in a lawsuit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, leading to a $4 million dollar recovery. Cole v. St. James Healthcare Sys., No. DV-07-44 (Mont. 2d Jud. Dist. Ct. 2010).
  • Tom served as antitrust and co-lead counsel on behalf of a St. Joseph, Missouri heart surgeon in a lawsuit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, leading to a $1 million recovery. Clinch v. Heartland Reg'l. Med. Ctr., 03CV72021 (Buchanan Cty. Cir. Ct. 2006).
  • Tom successfully defended a small high-technology company against a would-be class action on behalf of millions of drivers' license holders seeking upwards of potentially billions of dollars in penalties and damages. Miller v. Image Data, LLC, 91 Fed.Appx. 122, 2004 WL 326998 (10th Cir. 2004).
  • Tom represented a Colorado Springs, Colorado heart surgeon in a civil rights suit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, obtaining a $5 million recovery. Morris v. Colo. Spgs. Mem'l Hosp., 99-MK-989 (D. Colo. 2003).
  • Tom served as antitrust and local counsel for the national plaintiffs' class in an antitrust action against a manufacturer of wide-format commercial ink-jet printers and cartridges, resulting in a class recovery valued in the millions of dollars. Colour Editions, Inc., d/b/a King Kolor v. Encad, Inc., 98-D-2490 (D. Colo. 2000).
  • Tom represented a small medical products company that had been excluded by the two dominant firms from competing in the national marketplace for certain handheld surgical devices, obtaining a $4.5 million recovery. BEAL Corp. Liquidating Trust v. Valleylab Inc., 927 F. Supp. 1350 (D. Colo. 1996).
  • Tom represented a La Junta, Colorado, radiologist in an antitrust suit against a hospital that had excluded him from practicing there, obtaining reinstatement and a recovery. Johnson v. Arkansas Valley Reg'l Med. Ctr., 93--____ (D. Colo. 1994).
  • Tom served as co-lead class counsel in a national securities fraud class action stemming from a defaulted Colorado special district bond issue, resulting in the recovery of $7.3 million on behalf bondholders nationwide. Abrams v. Southeastern Municipal Bonds, Inc., [1991 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶96,055 (D. Colo. 1991), [1990-91 Transfer Binder] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶95,757 (D. Colo. 1990).
  • As Chief of the Colorado Attorney General's Antitrust Unit, Tom served as lead counsel for the State of Colorado in a national antitrust class action against insurors, ultimately resulting in a multi-million dollar recovery. In re Ins. Antitrust Litig., 723 F. Supp. 464 (N.D. Calif. 1989), rev'd, 938 F.2d 919 (9th Cir. 1991), aff'd in part, rev'd in part sub nom. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 113 S. Ct. 2891 (1993).
  • While Chief of the Colorado Attorney General's Antitrust Unit, Tom represented the State of Colorado in an antitrust suit against a national highway contractor, obtaining a $1.575 million recovery. Colorado v. Peter Kiewit Sons. Co., 84-Z-1225 (D. Colo. 1987).
  • While Chief of the Colorado Antitrust Unit, Tom successfully represented the State of Colorado and 22 other amici states before the U.S. Supreme Court in a landmark antitrust case pertaining to state action immunity. Community Commc'ns Co. v. City of Boulder, 455 U.S. 40 (1981).

Get Started Now! Call 303-785-1617or fill out our form

* Denotes required field

eg. xxx-xxx-xxxx

Please explain your legal situation.


* Please enter the security code shown below:

Captcha Image


The Lead Counsel Rating
Copyright © 2016 LawInfo.com, Inc. All rights are reserved. Privacy Policy
No portion of this site may be reproduced in any manner in any medium without the express written consent of LawInfo.com, Inc.

Lead Counsel Rated Law Firm

Click Here to Learn More