Washington Employment Lawyer
Peter Moote
One of the greatest tragedies that can occur to an individual or family is for wage earners to lose their jobs or have to quit their jobs because of intolerable working conditions. People develop a standard of living and lifestyle based upon the income they are able to earn. When that income is lost, their standard of living can be destroyed. In the past, employers have had almost complete power in dictating rules in the workplace. That situation is changing.
The legislature and courts are recognizing the importance of employment and the need of workers to have equal rights and power. Because the law has been improving for workers, employers have hired sophisticated managers and human resource supervisors to make employment decisions. Employees are required to work with these trained managers who dictate conditions of work and decisions on employment rights to the employee. These managers have the interests of the companies at heart and not the worker. The only way for an employee to be protected is to know your rights. Don't sign any documents or quit your employment until you talk to an attorney who will have your interests at heart.
As an experienced Washington Employment Lawyer, I provide solid legal guidance to workers in Bellingham, Olympia, Vancouver, throughout Island County and throughout the State of Washington, in the following practice areas:
Harassment/Hostile Work Environment:
Employees cannot be forced to endure sexual harassment or hostile working conditions in the workplace. Whenever sexual harassment or hostility occurs, a report of it must be made to management of the employer. If a complaint is made and the condition continues, the harassed employee should contact an attorney immediately and file a claim with the EEOC within 300 days of the start of the harassment.
Age Discrimination:
An employee cannot be discriminated in the workplace on the basis of age. In this quickly-moving economy, many individuals are terminated, denied promotions or denied opportunities for employment because they are older workers. There is a presumption that an individual fired or denied promotion or an opportunity for employment who is over 40 has been discriminated against on the basis of age.
Race and Gender Discrimination:
It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against an employee on the basis of race, religion, gender or sexual preference. Discrimination often comes in the form of termination from employment, denial of promotion, denial of raises or denial of job opportunities.
Medical Leave Rights:
State and Federal (FMLA) laws protect the jobs of workers who need to take extended leave for serious medical conditions or to take leave to care for a family member with a serious medical condition. When an employee returns to work from extended medical leave they are entitled to their job back at the same rate of pay and benefits.
Wage and Overtime Claims:
Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Washington Wage Laws (WMWA) employers are required to pay regular hourly wages that no less than $7 per hour and overtime wages to any employee working in excess of 40 hours per work week. Each separate work week is evaluated. The employer cannot add up hours and average over multiple weeks or a year. If you work over 40 hours in any week you are entitled to overtime wages even if you work less than 40 hours in other weeks. The rate of overtime wages is at a minimum 1.5 times the regular hourly rate. If your wages are calculated in a lump sum or salary for a period of time we simply calculate the hourly rate from that. Employers cannot avoid paying overtime by naming wages "salary," unless the employee is truly in a management position.
These rights in employment are protected by both federal and state laws. Each of these laws has different protections that should be explored if the worker has been discriminated against. Any suspected violations should be reviewed with an attorney because the long-term losses to the worker can be substantial.
Though Washington is an at-will employment state, employers who make promises or contracts (verbal or written) with employees must live up to those or be in breach of the employment contract. If promises made in the employment relationship are breached, the employee should seek the advice of an attorney.
There are limitations periods that require the filing of claims or lawsuits within a specific time frame or the right of the employee is forever lost. Some of the more significant deadlines an employee should be aware of include the following: State employment violations — three years. Federal discrimination violations require EEOC claim filing — 300 days. Receipt of federal right to sue letter — 90 days. Federal tort violations — two years. Breach of verbal promises in employment — one year or three years. Breach of written employment promises — six years. Wage and leave violations — 2 years or 3 years.
Workers' Compensation:
As a skilled Washington Employment Lawyer, I am also able to help employees in Bellingham, Olympia, Vancouver, throughout Island County and throughout the State of Washington with Workers' Compensation issues. The Industrial Insurance system (commonly known as worker's compensation) originally developed to provide immediate benefits to injured workers, irrespective of fault. It is a no-fault system of guaranteed coverage for all workers injured in the course of employment. It does not matter if the employer, worker or co-employee is at fault. Coverage is certain and immediate.
The system sounds ideal, but as it has evolved it has turned into an adversarial system with sophisticated claims managers and insurance adjusters doing all they can to deny claims and to terminate benefits. The worst part of this changed process is that the claims managers and insurance adjusters are well trained, experienced professionals that the workers are required to deal with.
If you or someone you know in Bellingham, Olympia, Vancouver, throughout Island County or throughout the state needs the help of an experienced Washington Employment Lawyer, call Attorney Peter Moote today at 866-739-0341, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.
Practice Areas and Legal Definitions
Labor Laws:
Historically, labor laws have focused on such matters as eliminating unsafe workplace conditions, securing a living wage for employees, and eliminating, or at least, tempering the strife that often occurs between employee and employers. Since the appearance of organized labor, laws have established collective bargaining rights, and have sought to prevent either employers or employees, individually or through associations or unions, from engaging in unfair labor practices. It is well-established, by various statutes, that both sides to a labor dispute are legally required to engage in good faith collective bargaining. Modern labor laws also address such complex and often emotionally charged issues as strikes, picketing, mutual injunctive relief and lockouts.
Labor and Employment attorneys can help employers with the following:
- Reviewing client employee handbooks, manuals and policy statements
- Assisting with federal and state wage and hour law issues and claims
- Representing employers before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies
- Providing advice on issues involving National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) representation and elections including campaign assistance
- Representing employers in unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board and state labor agencies
- Providing representation for grievance and arbitration hearings under collective bargaining agreements
- Collective bargaining on behalf of clients including strategic planning and acting as spokesperson
- Counseling on issues related to strikes or lockouts and providing related litigation support
Employment Law:
Employment law is a well-established body of statutes and judicial decisions covering all rights and obligations within the employer-employee relationship, including current employees, job applicants and former employees. It covers a wide range of legal issues, ranging from employment discrimination and wrongful termination to matters involving wages and workplace safety. Many employment law issues are governed by applicable federal and state employment law, but a number of issues are determined according to basic contract law.
Employee Rights:
All employees have basic rights arising from both state and federal laws. Some of these rights include: the right not to be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, skin color, gender, pregnancy, religious beliefs, disability, age, and in some places, marital status or sexual orientation; the right to a workplace free of harassment; the right to be paid at least the minimum wage as provided by federal or state law; the right to overtime wages as provided by federal or state law; the right to a safe workplace and the right to take leave to care for a personal or family member's serious illness, or following the birth or adoption of a child.
Employment Discrimination:
Discrimination generally occurs when an employee is intentionally treated differently because of race, color, religion, national origin, disability, gender, age, and in some states, sexual orientation. Employment discrimination claims may be prosecuted under various state and federal statutes. Even if the employee’s evidence is sufficient to show discrimination, an employer may be able to justify a particular job action by demonstrating that such treatment arose out of business necessity, or that a legitimate job qualification required consideration of factors that had an unintentional discriminatory effect. When the employer makes such a legitimate justification, the employee must show that discrimination, not the employer’s justification, was the true reason for the action.
Age Discrimination:
It is unlawful for an employer, employment agency or labor union to discriminate in employment on the basis of age. This includes refusing to hire an individual or firing an employee. It also includes an individual’s compensation, the terms, conditions, and privileges of his or her employment, and all employee benefits.
Disability Discrimination:
Both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protect individuals with disabilities from employment discrimination. An individual with a disability is defined as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, has a record of having such a physical or mental impairment, or is regarded as having such impairment. The term is broadly defined to include any physiological, mental or psychologically-based impairment, but it does not include mere physical characteristics or cultural, environmental, or economic impairment—the impairment must cause a substantial limitation to a major life activity. Temporary conditions, such as a broken arm or the flu, would not be considered substantial limitations amounting to a disability entitled to statutory protection.
Wrongful Termination:
Termination of employment cannot be classified as "Wrongful Termination" unless it is in violation of some fundamental public policy, as set forth in a state or federal statute, regulation or constitutional provision. Examples of Wrongful Termination include situations where:
- An employee is discharged for failure to comply with an order to perform an act that violates some law, ordinance or regulation, or
- An employee is discharged in retaliation for complaints about conduct by the employer that he or she believes to be unlawful, e.g., failure to pay overtime, or failure to comply with safety regulations.
Sexual Harassment:
Sexual harassment is any unwanted and unwelcome sexual behavior. It involves a broad range of conduct, including such verbal harassment as derogatory comments, explicit sexual comments and descriptions of sexual exploits, leering or requesting sexual favors. The term also describes physical harassment, ranging from inappropriate touching to outright sexual assault. In order to be classified as illegal the conduct in question must be both unwelcome and offensive to the victim.
Sexual harassment is a form of sexual discrimination, prohibited in employment settings under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title IX of the 1972 Education Act makes sexual harassment in schools or other educational settings unlawful. The Federal Fair Housing Act also provides protection against sexual harassment, and most states have enacted legislation making it unlawful.
Overtime Compensation:
Under both State and Federal law employers are required to pay additional compensation to eligible employees who work more than forty hours during any seven-day period. For every hour over forty hours in any given workweek the employer must pay the eligible employee at least one and one-half times the employee's ordinary hourly rate.
Defamation (Libel & Slander):
Defamation is the communication of a false and unprivileged statement that exposes another to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or which causes him or her to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in his or her trade or occupation. The defamatory statement must be communicated to someone other than the person to whom it refers and it must refer to a living person.
Defamation communicated verbally it is called "Slander," but if it is communicated in writing, it is called "Libel". As a general rule it is easier to recover damages in a lawsuit for libel than in a slander lawsuit. Most defamation litigation in the employment arena concerns the employer’s “qualified privilege” to defame. Under this concept, employers and former employers are often protected from liability for defaming employees or former employees. By its very definition, however, the privilege is “qualified,” and not “absolute”. It is generally limited to situations in which the employer or former employer is making a good faith communication of information to someone who has a legitimate interest in receiving it. A good example of this is a former employer’s good faith response to a new or prospective employer’s inquiry about the job performance of a former employee. Generally speaking, even if the information given is false and damaging and would otherwise give rise to a defamation lawsuit, it will be protected under the “qualified” privilege.
If the communication exceeds the scope of the privilege, the privilege is not available. For example, if the communication to your new or prospective employer is not in response to an inquiry, but a voluntary and unsolicited communication, liability for defamation will attach if the information is untrue. Even if the communication is made in response to prospective employer’s inquiry, false and damaging information will not be protected by the privilege if it is made with knowledge or reckless disregard of its falsity, or with the intent to cause injury to the former employee. It is important to remember that however damaging it may be, a truthful statement cannot form the basis of a defamation lawsuit. This legal truism is often expressed in the phrase: "The Truth is a complete defense to a defamation action."
Severance Agreements:
A severance agreement is a form of settlement agreement under which an aggrieved employee agrees to accept an agreed sum of money in exchange for, among other things, abandoning all claims against the employer. Where it can be negotiated, a severance agreement saves money and aggravation for both sides. Severance agreements commonly include such provisions as "mutual non-disclosure of terms," an agreement that the employee will not compete against the employer, and that neither the employer nor the employee will make negative comments about the other.
Trade Secrets Agreements:
Employment contracts frequently contain provisions for the protection of the employer’s “trade secrets”. These may range from customer data of one kind or another, to company designs, or even “secret recipes”. Typically, the Trade Secrets clause of an employment contract will provide for “liquidated” damages in the event of disclosure of the information. Liquidated damages are a set dollar figure agreed-upon in advance, to be paid in the event the contract clause is violated.
Non-competition Agreements:
Non-competition agreements are provisions contained within an employment contract which restrict the activities of an employee after leaving the service of the company. Courts treat non-competition agreements with suspicion—with an eye toward preventing unnecessary and unreasonable interference with a person’s livelihood after severance of the employer/employee relationship.
The Courts will often decline to enforce “unreasonable” non-competition agreements. A non-competition clause in the agreement under which a used car lot employs an auto mechanic will likely be summarily rejected by the court as unreasonable. The agreement must be reasonable in duration. A non-competition agreement barring the sales manager of a used car lot from engaging in the used car business for the rest of his or her life, or for 50 years, would probably be denied enforcement, while one with a 2-year term might well be enforced. Non-competition agreements must be reasonable in the area covered. If the agreement precludes the sales manager from engaging in the used car business anywhere in North America, it will almost certainly be denied enforcement as unreasonable. If the area is limited to Island County, for example, it would probably withstand court scrutiny.
Whistleblower Claims:
Whistleblower Claims involve employer retaliation, sometimes to the extent of Wrongful Termination, against an employee who reports the improper or unlawful conduct of another employee or of management itself to government authorities. It is illegal for an employer to retaliate against a “whistleblower.”
Administrative Law:
Administrative Law is a system of justice outside the judicial system that is designed to bring resolution to conflicts arising within a detailed and technical structure of regulations. Administrative Law Courts have a reputation for resolving issues with greater speed and efficiency than the judicial system. Final Administrative Law decisions can be challenged in the Courts, but not until all administrative remedies have been exhausted. Final Administrative Law decisions can also be converted to Court Judgments and then enforced by any of the traditional remedies available for the enforcement of civil judgments.
Injunctions:
Injunctions are a type of Court Order that either requires or prohibits specified conduct or behavior. Injunctions are remedies frequently used in employment cases. They involve such situations as injunctions requiring striking public employees to return to work, or injunctions requiring someone to stop engaging in an unlawful employment practice. Willful failure to comply with an injunction can lead to a citation for contempt of court, and can result in significant money sanctions or even time in jail for the purpose of coercing compliance.
Workers’ Compensation:
Workers’ Compensation is a state-run system under which employees receive various types and levels of compensation for on-the-job injuries. Generally speaking, the dollar amount of compensation in Workers’ Compensation cases is much lower than in ordinary civil actions to recover damages for personal injuries. On the other hand, the level of proof required is much lower than in a personal injury case. The claimant in a Workers’ Compensation case is not required to prove that the employer was negligent or otherwise at fault. All the claimant need establish in a Workers' Compensation case is that the employee was injured in the course of his or her employment, and that the injury was not the result of the employee's own willful misconduct.
Employment Policy Manuals & Employee Handbooks:
An extraordinarily high percentage of Employment Law conflicts arise because there simply is no established company policy on a particular issue or the existing policy is either unknown or poorly understood. Competent Employment Law counsel can help draft and put together a company policy manual that is both comprehensive and understandable, and an employee handbook that leaves no doubt as to what is expected from each employee, and what he or she can expect from the company.
Preparation and presentation of employee/management classes covering Ohio Sexual Harassment & Employment Discrimination Issues:
Most Sexual Harassment and Employment Discrimination cases these days are the result of ignorance of and lack of sensitivity to these issues at various levels of management. Arranging for formal classes concerning these matters can be both expensive and inconvenient, but the results of employee/management education about these matters will usually pay enormous dividends in terms of smooth employer/employee relations, and also in the peace of mind associated with avoiding expensive litigation and exposure to civil liability.
If you or someone you know in Bellingham, Olympia, Vancouver, throughout Island County or throughout the state needs the help of an experienced Washington Employment Lawyer, call Attorney Peter Moote today at 866-739-0341, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.
If you or someone you know in Bellingham, Olympia, Vancouver, throughout Island County or throughout the state needs the help of an experienced Washington Employment Lawyer, call Attorney Peter Moote today at 866-739-0341, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.
ADDRESS OF THE FIRM:
Employment Law Firm of Peter Moote
5492 Harbor Avenue
Freeland, WA 98249
Telephone: 866-739-0341
Fax: 360-331-7755
MEMBERS OF THE FIRM:
Peter Moote
Peter Moote has been an aggressive champion of personal and civil rights for 25 years. Now in his early fifties, Peter limits his practice to claims of injured persons and wrongfully treated employees.
Peter is a member of the Washington State Bar Association, American Bar Association, American Trial Lawyer's Association and one of the prestigious Eagles in the Washington State Trial Lawyer's Association. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States Court of Claims and all Washington state courts.
Peter graduated from the University of Washington and received his juris doctor degree in law at Seattle University School of Law in 1975. He was admitted to the Washington State Bar Association the same year. He is also admitted to the Federal Courts. He obtained special legal training at the Hastings College of Legal Advocacy program at the University of California — Berkley and a certificate of employment and civil rights litigation at the University of Washington.
- Seyfarth Shaw Pro Bono Attorneys and the Victims Rights Law Center Secure MA High Court Victory for Victims' Rights (Business Wire via Yahoo! Finance)
BOSTON----Seyfarth Shaw LLP, one of America's leading full-service law firms, and the Victims Rights Law Center today announced that attorneys from the firm working pro bono secured complete dismissal of civil claims against their clients from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. - Services Held Today For Victims; Reward Offered In Case (WITN 7 North Carolina)
Services are being held today for the two victims in Tuesday morning's drive-by shooting in downtown Greenville. There is a $10,000 reward for the arrest of their suspected killer. ECU students are planning an anti-violence march and vigil. - Stanley P. Weiner, key figure in Royals’ plan to stay in KC, retires from law firm (The Kansas City Star)
Tax lawyer Stanley P. Weiner, a key figure in Ewing Kauffman’s plan to keep the Royals in Kansas City, is retiring after 25 years at Shook, Hardy & Bacon. One of the top tax lawyers in the country, Weiner was instrumental in devising the complicated succession plan under which the baseball team’s founder and owner bequeathed the team to the Greater Kansas City Community Foundation and Affiliated ... - p2pnet World Headlines - June 29, 2009 (p2pnet.net)
Secret police wiretaps flying under the radar CBC Bob McMynn knows first-hand how Canada’s laws allow police to eavesdrop and use emergency wiretaps without a judge’s approval. He says Section 184.4 of the Criminal Code helped to save his son Graham’s life after a group of young men abducted the then 23-year-old university student at [...] - The many dimensions of health care reform (The Record and Herald News)
Letters on health care reform, movies appropriate for children, pushing bounds of legal logic, HUMC North and more state work for EnCap's lawyers. - Universities use vague law to keep public records concealed (Daily News Journal)
College athletic departments use vague law to keep public records from being seen - 151 Sidley Lawyers Recognized in Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business for 2009 (Business Wire via Yahoo! Finance)
NEW YORK----Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business has named 151 lawyers from Sidley Austin LLP as leaders in their field in their 2009 guide. In addition to lawyer rankings, the Chambers guide ranks practices on a national and regional basis. - The Nursing Home Complaint Center Intends To Team Up With Personal Injury Law Firms To Stop Nursing Home Abuse & ... (PRWeb)
The Nursing Home Abuse Center wants to assist personal injury law firms go after nursing homes, for elder abuse, and wrongful death in every state, by teaming up with established personal injury law firms that have a passion about elder abuse issues, in their specific state. The Nursing Home Complaint Center also wants to work with law firm that also have an interest in Medicare-Medicaid fraud, ... - The Nursing Home Complaint Center Intends To Team Up With Personal Injury Law Firms To Stop Nursing Home Abuse & ... (PRWeb via Yahoo! News)
The Nursing Home Abuse Center wants to assist personal injury law firms go after nursing homes, for elder abuse, and wrongful death in every state, by teaming up with established personal injury law firms that have a passion about elder abuse issues, in their specific state. - Stanford Indicted in $7 Billion Scam With Regulator (Update1) (Bloomberg)
June 21 (Bloomberg) -- Texas financier Allen Stanford was indicted with a former Antiguan regulator on charges they helped direct a $7 billion fraud that U.S. prosecutors said put the “integrity of the markets” at risk.
Additional Questions or need further information?