Practice Areas and Legal Definitions

Permanent Resident:
A Permanent Resident is an alien admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident. Permanent residents are also commonly referred to as immigrants; however, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) broadly defines an immigrant as any alien in the United States, except one legally admitted under specific nonimmigrant categories (INA section 101(a) (15)). An illegal alien who entered the United States without inspection, for example, would be strictly defined as an immigrant under the INA, but is not a permanent resident alien. Lawful permanent residents are legally accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States. They may be issued immigrant visas by the Department of State overseas or adjusted to permanent resident status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in the United States.

Consular Processing:
If an individual is in another country, he or she may apply for a visa or green card in the U.S. embassy of his or her home country. Attorney Rhoda Domingo is able to facilitate all of the paperwork and applications and contact the consular officers to facilitate approval of the application.

Criminal Deportation/Removal Defense:
Immigrants in the United States who have been charged or convicted of a crime can be subsequently placed in deportation or removal proceedings.  Since September 30, 1996, with the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, (Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 "IIRAIRA"), the rights of aliens in the United States have been severely curtailed when past criminal conduct is a factor. Crimes that previously did not cause immigration consequences can now trigger deportation proceedings against an alien. Crimes as serious as murder, and as minor as shoplifting, can result in deportation.

There are three agencies, which may have jurisdiction or input into a deportation or removal proceeding:

• USCIS – U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (for green cards and citizenship)
• ICE – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement(for deportations and investigations)
• CBP – U.S. Customs and Border Protection(for airport and border crossing issues)

Non-Criminal Deportation/Removal Defense:
Deportation (or removal) occurs when an alien is found to have violated certain immigration or criminal laws, consequences being that the alien forfeits his or her right to remain in the U.S., and is usually barred from returning.

If the DHS believes that you should be removed or deported from the United States, or an individual is found "inadmissible" to the United States, the DHS will issue a piece of paper called a "Notice to Appear" or "NTA" which initiates court proceedings to determine if an individual is removable, deportable or inadmissible from the United States.  An Immigration Judge presides over these court proceedings which are held at US Immigration Courts across the country. These are formal court hearings and should be taken very seriously as your immigration record may be permanently affected and you can be physically deported from the United States. Only an Immigration Judge can determine if you are removable, deportable or inadmissible and whether you have relief from removal. If the Immigration Judge denies relief, you may appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals which has jurisdiction over decisions made by Immigration Judges.

Employment Based Cases:
U.S. immigration law is consciously designed to serve the interests of both employers and workers. There are many avenues through which employers can petition for foreign-born employees. Our immigration laws protect U.S. workers by restricting employment-based immigration to persons whose skills and expertise are otherwise unavailable in the domestic workforce.

A person seeking to permanently enter the U.S. workforce through employer sponsorship is not admissible unless the Department of Labor certifies that he or she will not displace nor adversely affect the wages and working conditions of U.S. workers who are similarly employed. The employer must file an application with DOL establishing that both of these criteria have been met.

Family Based Visas/ Fiancée Visas:
Fathers, daughters, mothers, sons, fiancés and other relatives can enter the United States with either an immigrant or non-immigrant visa. There are many options that are available. Parents, spouses and unmarried children under 21 years of age of U.S. Citizens are considered immediate relatives and are not placed under a quota system. The others are placed into preference order which determines who is given priority entry into the United States:

• First Preference: Unmarried, adult (21 years of age or older) sons and daughters of U.S. citizens.
• Second Preference: Spouses of lawful permanent residents and the unmarried sons and daughters of lawful permanent residents.
• Third Preference: Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens.
• Fourth Preference: Brothers and sisters of adult U.S. citizens.

This process can take a very long time (several years) depending upon the preference ranking. The most current online visa bulletin will give those who are waiting an idea of how long they must wait for their immigration application or green card to be granted.

Fiancée Visas:
For those seeking to bring a fiancé or fiancée to the United States, a K-1 visa application will allow the fiancé (e) to enter the United States. Both parties must be unmarried, legally divorced or annulled, or widowed.  The marriage must take place within 90 days of entry into the United States.

H, L, E, Visas:
Non-immigrant work visas (H, L, O, P, Q) require a CIS-approved petition from a U.S. sponsor. Treaty-trader or treaty-investor visas (E1/E2) can be applied for directly by the individual as long as he or she is from a country with which the United States has a treaty.

The most common work-related visas are H-1B Visas and L1 Visas. The H-1B is a way to bring foreign-born professionals to the United States for a period of up to six years. A sponsor is required and the employment may only start up when the new employee is in the United States. The L1- Visa is for people working for an employer abroad for one year in a related business entity in a manager, executive or specialized knowledge staff capacity, and who will come to the United States to continue providing services for his or her employer. Visas can include:

• B1 Temporary visitor for business
• B2 Temporary visitor for pleasure
• B1/B2 Temporary visitor for business or pleasure
• E1 Treaty trader, spouse and children
• E2 Treaty investor, spouse and children
• H1B (petition-based) Temporary worker in a specialty occupation
• H1C (petition-based) Registered nurses
• H2A (petition-based) Temporary worker performing agricultural services unavailable in the United States
• H2B (petition-based) Temporary worker performing non-agricultural services unavailable in the United States H3 (petition-based) Industrial trainee
• H4 (petition-based) Dependent of H1, H2 or H3
• L1 (petition-based) Intra-company transferee (executive, managerial, and specialized personnel continuing employment with an international firm or corporation)
• L2 (petition-based) Dependent of L1
• O1 (petition-based) Aliens with extraordinary ability in sciences, arts, education, business or athletics
• O2 (petition-based) Aliens accompanying and assisting the above in a professional capacity
• O3 (petition-based) Dependent of O1 or O2
• P1 (petition-based) Athletes and entertainers for a specific competition or performance
• P2 (petition-based) Athletes and entertainers participating in reciprocal exchange program
• P3 (petition-based) Artists and entertainers performing under a program that is culturally unique
• P4 (petition-based) Dependent of P1, P2 or P3
• Q (petition-based) International cultural exchange visitor

Board of Immigration Appeals/Federal Court Litigation:
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) is the highest administrative body for interpreting and applying immigration laws.  The Board has been given nationwide jurisdiction to hear appeals from certain decisions rendered by Immigration Judges and by District Directors of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in a wide variety of proceedings in which the Government of the United States is one party and the other party is either an alien, a citizen or a business.  In addition, the Board is responsible for the recognition of organizations and accreditation of representatives requesting permission to practice before DHS, the Immigration Courts and the Board.

Decisions of the Board are binding on all DHS officers and Immigration Judges unless modified or overruled by the Attorney General or a Federal court.  All Board decisions are subject to judicial review in the Federal courts.  The majority of appeals reaching the Board involve orders of removal and applications for relief from removal.  Other cases before the Board include the exclusion of aliens applying for admission to the United States, petitions to classify the status of alien relatives for the issuance of preference immigrant visas, fines imposed upon carriers for the violation of immigration laws, and motions for reopening and reconsideration of decisions previously rendered.

While most immigration matters involve administrative court proceedings at the US Immigration Courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals, federal courts such as the Court of Appeals and the U.S. District Courts have jurisdiction over very significant immigration matters.

Employment Visas/Labor Certification:
Companies that need qualified workers, but are unable to find enough U.S. workers to fill those positions, can use the labor certification process to sponsor workers from other countries. In most cases, these workers have specific medical skills, technical ability and bilingual experience and work in occupations like engineering, medicine, teaching, computer science or research.

It is critical that each application is meticulously prepared, all deadlines are met, all references are verified, data is exact and everything documented is in accordance with all current laws.  The types of immigration law work employees and employers may require can include, but is not limited to:

• PERM Application
• E-1/E-2 – Treaty Country Investor Visas
• EB1 - National Interest Waiver, Alien Of Extraordinary Ability, Outstanding Professor Or Researcher, Multinational Executive
• EB2 - Member Of Profession Holding An Advanced Degree Or Alien Of Exceptional Ability
• EB3 - Skilled Worker Or Professional
• EB4 - Any Other Worker
• EB5 - Immigrant Investor
• H-2A – Seasonal Worker Visas
• H-2B - Other Seasonal Work Visas
• L-1 - Inter-Company Transferees Visas

Naturalization:
Naturalization is the process by which a foreign person becomes a U.S. citizen. Almost everyone who goes through naturalization must first have held a green card for several years.  A naturalized U.S. citizen has virtually the same rights as a native-born American citizen.

Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is conferred upon a foreign citizen or national after he or she fulfills the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).  The general requirements for administrative naturalization include:

• a period of continuous residence and physical presence in the United States;
• residence in a particular USCIS District prior to filing;
• an ability to read, write and speak English;
• a knowledge and understanding of U.S. history and government;
• good moral character;
• attachment to the principles of the U.S. Constitution; and,
• favorable disposition toward the United States.

All naturalization applicants must demonstrate good moral character, attachment and favorable disposition. The other naturalization requirements may be modified or waived for certain applicants, such as spouses of U.S. citizens.

Political Asylum:
Political Asylum may be granted to people who are already in the United States and are unwilling or unable to return to their home country because of persecution or a well-founded fear or persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion. As of 1996, persons in the United States have one calendar year to apply for political asylum, unless the conditions of the country of persecution change or there are exceptional circumstances.

Waivers of Inadmissibility:
An Application for a Waiver of Inadmissibility is an application for legal entry to the United States made by an individual who is otherwise inadmissible on one or more grounds.  The application is submitted to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a Bureau of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Employment Authorization:
U.S. employers must check to make sure all employees, regardless of citizenship or national origin, are allowed to work in the United States. If you are not a citizen or a lawful permanent resident, you may need to apply for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) to prove you may work in the United States.

USCIS issues Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) in the following categories:

• EAD:  This document proves you are allowed to work in the United States.
• Renewal EAD:  You should apply for a renewal EAD six months before your original EAD expires.
• Replacement EAD:  This document replaces a lost, stolen or mutilated EAD.  A replacement EAD also replaces an EAD that was issued with incorrect information, such as a misspelled name.
• Interim EAD:  If USCIS does not approve or deny your EAD application within 90 days (within 30 days for an asylum applicant; note: asylum applicants are eligible to file for EADs only after waiting 150 days from the date they filed their properly completed original asylum applications), you may request an interim EAD document.
• The specific categories that require an Employment Authorization Document include (but are not limited to) asylees and asylum seekers; refugees; students seeking particular types of employment; applicants to adjust to permanent residence status; people in or applying for temporary protected status; fiancés of American citizens; and dependents of foreign government officials.  Please see Form I-765 (Application for Employment Authorization) for a complete list of the categories of people who must apply for an Employment Authorization Document to be able to work in the United States.
• If you are a U.S. citizen, you do not need an Employment Authorization Document.
• If you are a lawful permanent resident or a conditional permanent resident, you do not need an Employment Authorization Document.  Your Alien Registration Card proves that you may work in the United States.
• If you are authorized to work for a specific employer, such as a foreign government, you do not need an Employment Authorization Document.  Your passport and your Form I-94 (Arrival-Departure Record) prove that you may work in the United States.  Please see 8 CFR 274a.12(b), which provides a full list of the categories of people who do not need to apply for an EAD.

Temporary Protected Status:
Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a temporary immigration status granted to eligible nationals of designated countries (or parts thereof). In 1990, as part of the Immigration Act of 1990 (“IMMACT”), P.L. 101-649, Congress established a procedure by which the Attorney General may provide TPS to aliens in the United States who are temporarily unable to safely return to their home country because of ongoing armed conflict, an environmental disaster, or other extraordinary and temporary conditions.  On March 1, 2003, pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, the authority to designate a country (or part thereof) for TPS, and to extend and terminate TPS designations, was transferred from the Attorney General to the Secretary of Homeland Security.  At the same time, responsibility for administering the TPS program was transferred from the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (Service) to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

During the period for which a country has been designated for TPS, TPS beneficiaries may remain in the United States and may obtain work authorization.  However, TPS does not lead to permanent resident status.  When the Secretary terminates a TPS designation, beneficiaries revert to the same immigration status they maintained before TPS (unless that status had since expired or been terminated) or to any other status they may have acquired while registered for TPS.  Accordingly, if an alien had unlawful status prior to receiving TPS and did not obtain any status during the TPS designation, the alien reverts to unlawful status upon the termination of that TPS designation.

TN Visas:
When the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January 1, 1994, a category for Mexican and Canadian professionals was created to allow for temporary entry into the United States.

Under the NAFTA, Mexican and Canadian professionals are now eligible for Trade NAFTA (TN) status.  Under TN status, Mexican and Canadian citizens in certain professions may enter the United States to work for a U.S. company on a temporary basis.  Eligible professionals may also work for Mexican and Canadian companies in the United States.

In order to qualify for TN status, the applicant must be intending to be involved in a profession listed in Appendix 1603.D.1 of NAFTA and the applicant must possess the required credentials to be considered a "professional”.  In most, but not all of the listed professions, a bachelor's degree or better is usually required.  However, the list of eligible professions also includes occupations which do not necessarily require a bachelor's degree as a minimum requirement.  Examples of these occupations are management consultants, hotel managers, librarians and graphic designers. The requirements for each of these categories appear in Appendix 1603.D.l of NAFTA.

I-130 Petition:
An I-130 is a Petition for Alien Relatives and it applies to mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and children.  Parents, spouses and unmarried children under 21 years of age of U.S. Citizens are considered immediate relatives and are not placed under a quota system.  The others are placed into preference order which determines who is given priority entry into the United States:

• First preference: Unmarried adult (21 years of age or older) sons/daughters of US citizens
• Second preference:  Spouses of lawful permanent residents and unmarried sons and daughters of lawful permanent residents
• Third preference:  Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens
• Fourth Preference:  Brothers and sisters of adult U.S. citizens

This process can take a very long time (several years) depending upon the preference ranking. The most current online visa bulletin will give those who are waiting an idea of how long they must wait for their immigration application or green card to be granted.

If you or someone you know needs the assistance of an experienced San Francisco Immigration attorney, call The Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo today at 866-636-6125, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule a consultation. Hour consultations are $200, but if you retain us, you get $200 off the contract price. Se Habla Español. Services in Tagalog (the language of the Philippines) are also available.

If you or someone you know needs the assistance of an experienced San Francisco Immigration attorney, call The Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo today at 866-636-6125, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule a consultation. Hour consultations are $200, but if you retain us, you get $200 off the contract price. Se Habla Español. Services in Tagalog (the language of the Philippines) are also available.

ADDRESS OF THE FIRM:
The Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo
414 Jackson St.
Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: 866-636-6125
Hours: M-F, 8:00AM-5:00PM

MEMBERS OF THE FIRM:

Attorney Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo, Esq.

• Admitted to: US District Court of Northern California, US Court of Appeals for the 6th, 7th, 9th & 11th Circuits, US Supreme Court
  
• Jurisdictions Attorney is Licensed in: Pennsylvania
• Date Admitted to the Bar: Nov. 1986
• Education: San Francisco State University, B.A., 1977; Golden Gate Law School, J.D., 1983
• Professional Memberships & Achievements: American Immigration Lawyers Association, five published cases.

California Supreme Court Justice Cruz Reynoso swore-in Ms. Wilkinson Domingo as an attorney, in a private ceremony in his chambers.

In 1992 Ms. Wilkinson Domingo traveled to El Salvador with the Truth Commission after the Peace Accords were signed. The Commission investigated and reported on mascaras to the United Nations, after the 30 year civil war ended.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo worked at the San Francisco Rent Stabilization Board between l981 - 1991. Ms. Wilkinson Domingo was a hearing officer presiding over administrative hearings between landlords and tenants.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo volunteers from time to time, for the Bar Association of San Francisco and has been awarded certificates of Recognition for her work.

In the early 1990's Ms. Wilkinson Domingo volunteered on a AIDS/HIV panel for the Bar Association of San Fransisco. Volunteers Of The Month: Legalization/HIV Panel.

In the past Ms. Wilkinson Domingo has volunteered at the Asian Law office for its clinic.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo was interviewed in l990 for a newspaper about the importance of having accurate translations for all documents submitted to the immigration court, the asylum office and during courtroom testimony. Lack of Translation Can Cost Aliens Dearly Alien Justice - San Francisco Immigrant Court

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo is a supporter of the Immigrant legal Resource Center ILRC and has given informational talks regarding getting the media involved in winning cases & at Golden Gate Law School regarding for marriage fraud cases.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo is a strong advocate of immigrants right's. Ms. Wilkinson Domingo has written numerous letters to Senators, Congressional Representatives and the President of the United States.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo is a supporter of California Rural Legal Association.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo has been interviewed on "Radio Compensena" regarding various immigration issues.

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo has traveled extensively to:  Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Holland, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Spain, Singapore, Bali - Indonesia, Korea, the Caribbean, the Bahamas, El Salvador, Mexico, Canada, and throughout the United States including Hawaii, and Alaska.

Attorney Jarencio Valcarcel, Esq.

• Jurisdictions Attorney is Licensed in: California, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and in the Philippines
• Date Admitted to the Bar: California, 2005; Philippines, 1993
• Education: San Beda University, 1987; Manuel Luis Quezon University School of Law, 1992
• Professional Memberships & Achievements: American Immigration Lawyers Association; Integrated Bar of the Philippines; Clerked for Judge Rodrigo Cosico of the Regional Trial Court of Laguna for 2 years, 1995-2001: held private practice.
• Foreign Languages Spoken: Tagalog, Ilonggo

---

Support Staff

Mr. Henry Domingo

Ms. Wilkinson Domingo and her husband, Henry Domingo, have been working together since l992. Mr. Domingo retired from a previous career with RCA. In l991 Mr. Domingo took classes as an immigration paralegal to help his wife's law practice. However, currently Mr. Domingo takes care of the financial end of the business.

Maria Cervantes

Maria Cervantes has worked with Ms. Wilkinson Domingo since l993. Ms. Cervantes had seven years of experience with two immigration law firms, before joining Ms. Wilkinson Domingo. Ms. Cervantes is bilingual in both English and Spanish.

Sylvia Guerrero

Sylvia Guerrero has worked with Ms. Wilkinson Domingo since 2001 and has worked in the field of immigration law since l997. Ms. Guerrero is bilingual in both English and Spanish.

We accept both Visa and Master Cards.

Many of the cases that we have, we have rescued the cases after they have been denied, by filing motions to reopen. Four out of the five published cases are results from a motion to reopen.

Cannles-Vargas v. Gonzales, 441 F.3d 739 (9th Cir. 2006) This case involves a woman from Peru who applied for political asylum. It was decided that permanent or serious injury are not required to show persecution. The 9th circuit court of appeals found that anonymous death threats are sufficient to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution given the "low standard." Where substantial evidence did not support the Immigration Judge's denial of asylum because anonymous death threats were sufficient under the low standard requiring a 10% chance to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution.

Kay v. Ashcroft, 387 F. 3d 664 (7th Cir. 2004) This is a case where a man from Burma who understood very little English was ordered deported in his absence due to confusion about his court date. We were able to get his case reopened in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. The court held that an in absentia order does not become final for some purposes until the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rules on the motion to reopen, finding that in an absentia case, an order from the BIA does not become final for purposes of a motion to reopen under Section 208 until there is a final decision by the BIA on the absentia claim. In this case the court held that the evidence was clear for the applicant and the Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals denied the case without a rational explanation.

Azanor. Ashcroft, 364 F. 3d 1013 (9th Cir. 2004) This case concerns a woman from Nigeria who tortured from Female Genitalia Mutilation. Her case was denied but we were able to rescue it and have the case reopened under the Convention Against Torture Act. The court held that the Immigration Judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals erred when they erroneously determined that the applicant had to be tortured by someone in the government or action for the government, in order to qualify. A person qualifies for protection under the Convention Against Torture if the government acquiescences to the torture.

Cortez Acosta v. INS, 234 F.3d 476 (9th Cir. 2000) This concerns a man from Mexico, who was accused of alien smuggling with several other people. Mr. Cortez Acosta did not have an attorney at the time. At a group hearing the Immigration Judge did not make a verbatim transcript of the master hearing and inaccurately noted that the applicant had admitted to the allegation, when he had not. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reopened the case and Mr. Cortez Acosta's legal status was restored. However, during the time the case was pending, the INS deported Mr. Cortez Acosta. We were able to get a temporary Stay of Deportation from the Supreme Court, but eventually that expired and Mr. Cortez Acosta was returned to Mexico. After his status was restored, the officers at the Port of Entry were notified and he was admitted back to the U.S.

Altawil v. INS, 179 F.3d 791 (9th Cir. 1999)This case concerns a man fro Syria who submitted his change of address to the wrong Immigration office and consequently his case was held in his absence and he was ordered deported. We tried to get the case reopened, however the court held that it could not consider additional evidence under the law.

If you or someone you know needs the assistance of an experienced San Francisco Immigration attorney, call The Law Office of Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo today at 866-636-6125, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule a consultation. Hour consultations are $200, but if you retain us, you get $200 off the contract price. Se Habla Español. Services in Tagalog (the language of the Philippines) are also available.

Articles

The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, that was signed by President Reagan, provided that certain immigrants who has lived and worked in the United States could become Lawful Permanent Residents. However that law forgot to provide that the children of those immigrants be allowed to become lawful Permanent Residents also. The INS started trying to deport children even though their parents resided legally in the United States.

I helped change that law, with the help of several others, which allowed the children of immigrants to remain in the United States. Several news articles appeared in the newspapers about this issue. Some of those articles appeal here.

Also, a radio station, News 74 KCBS, broadcast a public service Editorial entitled "Rigorous Injustice" about the issue. Senator Barbara Boxer wrote a letter on behalf of my clients, the children who were facing deportation, urging the Immigration Service not to deport the kids. Congress discussed the problem and the names of my clients appeared in the Federal Register, Norberto and Eduardo Morales brothers. Finally, Congress passed a law called Family Unity, that changed the qualifying date of entry for the children which permitted several thousands of children to remain in the U.S. with their parents.

• 6 Kids Face Deportation - Town Steps In
  SF Chronicle,  April 5, 1990
• Patterson family pleads with INS to let boys stay
  The Modesto Bee, April 5, 1990
• Letter from House of Representatives Barbara Boxer to Mr. David Ilchert
  May 9, 1990
• Despite community pleas, INS moves to deport 6 Mexican kids
  SF Examiner, May, 1990
• INS Gives Brothers A Reprieve - 4 more months in U.S. for 2 Children
  SF Chronicle,  May 16, 1990
• INS backs off on sending Mexican boys back home
  SF Examiner,  May 16, 1990
• Patterson family pleads with INS to let boys stay
  The Modesto Bee, June 5, 1990
• Patterson children win delay in deportation case
  The Modesto Bee, June 22, 1990
• 'Amnesty' Wreaks Havoc with Migrants
  San Jose Mercury News, June 26, 1991
• Lack of Translation Can Cost Aliens Dearly
  Alien Justice - San Francisco Immigrant Court

• Volunteers OF The Month: Legalization/HIV Panel
  An Official Publication of the Bar Association of San Francisco, April 20, 1991

• Festival Fantochio
  Rhoda Wilkinson Domingo provided her services to the Compagnie Philippe Genty from France. She made it possible for their entire troupe to perform in San Francisco.

Location, Location & Location

Our office is located kitty corner from the Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS), Citizenship Immigration Services (CIS), Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE). Our office is 6 blocks from the Immigration Courts, Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR) and our office is one mile from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. This is important when it is necessary to file something immediately or for an emergency Stay of Deportation.

Our clients come from as far north as the Oregon border to Bakersfield along the California coast.  This includes such counties as Marin, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Cruz, Stanislaus, etc., and such cities as Oakland, San Jose, Richmond, Napa, Sonoma, Mendocino, Stockton, Sacramento, Vallejo, Fresno, Porterville, Visalia, Bakersfield, Redwood City, Martinez and Modesto.