Medford, Oregon Personal Injury Lawyer
Oregon Accident Attorney

Personal Injury Attorney Kelly L. Andersen has been representing clients in Medford, Oregon, since 1979.  He handles clients with legal issues involving product liability, medical malpractice, wrongful death and sexual abuse.  He is admitted to practice law in Oregon and U.S. District Court, District of Oregon, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit and U.S. Court of Claims.
Personal injury claims are legal disputes that arise when an individual suffers harm from an accident or injury caused by the negligence or intention of another individual or party.  A personal injury case can become formalized through civil court proceedings, or may be resolved through an informal settlement before a lawsuit is filed.

Unlike criminal cases, which are initiated by the government, a formal personal injury case typically starts when a private individual (plaintiff) files a civil charge against another individual, business, corporation, or government agency (defendant), alleging that their negligent or careless actions caused the plaintiff to sustain injury or harm.

Most personal injury disputes are resolved through an informal settlement, usually between those involved in the dispute, their insurers, and attorneys representing both sides. A settlement commonly takes the form of negotiation, followed by a written agreement in which both sides forgo any legal recourse, opting instead to resolve the dispute through an acceptable monetary arrangement.

 

What are Negligence Defenses?
In the case of negligence, damages awarded for a negligence claim may be reduced if there existed some type of contributory or comparative negligence. In some cases, if an assumption of risk was involved, the case may be dropped or the award reduced depending on the circumstances.

 What is Contributory Negligence?
The term "contributory negligence" is used to describe the actions of an injured person that may have also caused that person's own injuries. For example, a person who ignores a "Wet Floor" sign and slips and falls in the supermarket may be found to have been careless and at fault for any injuries sustained. "Contributory negligence" can prevent a person from collecting any monies to compensate for injuries suffered, even if that person's carelessness was minor. Some states have done away with the concept of contributory negligence and instead use the concept of "comparative negligence."

 What is Comparative Negligence?
Comparative negligence works on a percentage basis to assign a degree of fault for the injuries sustained. For example, a plaintiff in a products liability case cannot be found more than fifty percent at fault in order to be compensated for their injuries. If a plaintiff is found to be fifty-one percent at fault, he or she will not receive any damages for said injuries.  Plaintiffs who are found to be less than fifty-percent at fault, however, are awarded compensation in accordance to their percentage of fault. For example, a person slips and falls on a wet supermarket floor and is awarded $100,000.  The supermarket is found to be eighty-percent responsible for the accident because of dangerous floor conditions.  However, the injured plaintiff is found twenty percent responsible for not exercising caution, so the award is reduced to $80,000.

 

Visit: Kelly Andersen's website

Additional Questions or need further information?

Kelly L. Andersen
Kelly L. Andersen, P.C.
1730 E. McAndrews Road, Suite A
Medford, OR 97504
Phone: 866-821-0616
Fax: 541-608-0535

Remember, the more information you provide, the easier it is for us to help you.

What was the exact date of your injury?

Please list the full nature and extent of your injuries.

Please describe how you were injured, and who was at fault.

Please describe what the "at-fault" party did wrong to cause injury to you.

Please tell us the best time and way to contact you.


* Please enter the security code shown below:

Captcha Image

      

 

Experience, Ethics, Reputation.
Choose With Confidence.

Lawyers featured on LawInfo.com must be Lead Counsel Rated

Why Choose a Lead Counsel Rated Attorney?

  1. Professional Experience: Lead Counsel Attorneys average 21.6 years experience practicing law.
  2. Relevant Experience: Lead Counsel Attorneys devote at least 30% of their practices to the area of law in which they're listed.
  3. Reputation: LawInfo conducts peer reference checks to verify status and reputation in the legal community.
  4. Spotless Record: All Lead Counsel Attorneys are verified to be in good standing with their state bar associations and have no client related disciplinary action.

The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Attorney Advertising
Lawyer Marketing by Lawinfo.com
Copyright © 2009 LawInfo.com, Inc. All rights are reserved.
No portion of this site may be reproduced in any manner in any medium without the express written consent of LawInfo.com, Inc.
close

Call Us Now!
866-821-0616