California Labor & Employment Attorneys
HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC

Whether you are an employee wrongfully deprived of overtime pay and seeking recovery, or an employer wrongfully accused of sexual harassment and being sued, you will likely find the experience confusing, tedious and emotionally stressful.

As experienced California Labor & Employment Attorneys, we have great expertise in all aspects of state and federal labor law issues, including:
  • Employment Laws
  • Employee Rights
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Age Discrimination
  • Disability Discrimination
  • Wrongful Termination 
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Overtime Compensation 
  • Defamation
  • Severance Agreements 
  • Trade Secret Agreements
  • Non-competition Agreements
  • Whistleblower Claims
  • Administrative Law
  • Injunctions
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Employee Policy Manuals & Employee Handbooks
  • Non-competition Agreements

In the legal community, we are recognized as a team of aggressive and hard-hitting litigation experts, noted for our preparation, attention to detail and zealous advocacy on behalf of clients. As respected California Labor & Employment Attorneys, we regularly appear before the trial and appellate courts of the States of California, before various Administrative Law tribunals, the U.S. District Courts and the U.S. Courts of Appeal.

Our firm strives to preserve its appealing, boutique feel in order to provide attentive personal service that serves our clients’ diverse and unique needs and interests. We frequently collaborate with other nationally recognized firms to pool resources and pursue our common cause of achieving the best result for our clients. From settlement negotiations to mediations, arbitrations or trial, we remain attentive to our clients’ needs and aggressively protect their rights.

If you or someone you know in Orange County or throughout Southern California needs the assistance of an experienced California Labor & Employment Attorney, call HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC today at 866-287-3662, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.

Practice Areas and Legal Definitions


Labor Laws:

Historically, labor laws have focused on such matters as eliminating unsafe workplace conditions, securing a living wage for employees, and eliminating, or at least, tempering the strife that often occurs between employee and employers. Since the appearance of organized labor, laws have established collective bargaining rights, and have sought to prevent either employers or employees, individually or through associations or unions, from engaging in unfair labor practices. It is well-established, by various statutes, that both sides to a labor dispute are legally required to engage in good faith collective bargaining. Modern labor laws also address such complex and often emotionally charged issues as strikes, picketing, mutual injunctive relief and lockouts.

Labor and Employment attorneys can help employers with the following:

  • Reviewing client employee handbooks, manuals and policy statements
  • Assisting with federal and state wage and hour law issues and claims
  • Representing employers before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and state human rights agencies
  • Providing advice on issues involving National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) representation and elections including campaign assistance
  • Representing employers in unfair labor practice proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board and state labor agencies
  • Providing representation for grievance and arbitration hearings under collective bargaining agreements
  • Collective bargaining on behalf of clients including strategic planning and acting as spokesperson
  • Counseling on issues related to strikes or lockouts and providing related litigation support

Employment Law:
Employment law is a well-established body of statutes and judicial decisions covering all rights and obligations within the employer-employee relationship, including current employees, job applicants and former employees. It covers a wide range of legal issues, ranging from employment discrimination and wrongful termination to matters involving wages and workplace safety. Many employment law issues are governed by applicable federal and state employment law, but a number of issues are determined according to basic contract law.

Employee Rights:

All employees have basic rights arising from both state and federal laws. Some of these rights include: the right not to be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, skin color, gender, pregnancy, religious beliefs, disability, age, and in some places, marital status or sexual orientation; the right to a workplace free of harassment; the right to be paid at least the minimum wage as provided by federal or state law; the right to overtime wages as provided by federal or state law; the right to a safe workplace and the right to take leave to care for a personal or family member's serious illness, or following the birth or adoption of a child.

Employment Discrimination:

Discrimination generally occurs when an employee is intentionally treated differently because of race, color, religion, national origin, disability, gender, age, and in some states, sexual orientation. Employment discrimination claims may be prosecuted under various state and federal statutes. Even if the employee’s evidence is sufficient to show discrimination, an employer may be able to justify a particular job action by demonstrating that such treatment arose out of business necessity, or that a legitimate job qualification required consideration of factors that had an unintentional discriminatory effect. When the employer makes such a legitimate justification, the employee must show that discrimination, not the employer’s justification, was the true reason for the action.

Age Discrimination:

It is unlawful for an employer, employment agency or labor union to discriminate in employment on the basis of age. This includes refusing to hire an individual or firing an employee. It also includes an individual’s compensation, the terms, conditions, and privileges of his or her employment, and all employee benefits.

Disability Discrimination:

Both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protect individuals with disabilities from employment discrimination. An individual with a disability is defined as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, has a record of having such a physical or mental impairment, or is regarded as having such impairment. The term is broadly defined to include any physiological, mental or psychologically-based impairment, but it does not include mere physical characteristics or cultural, environmental, or economic impairment—the impairment must cause a substantial limitation to a major life activity. Temporary conditions, such as a broken arm or the flu, would not be considered substantial limitations amounting to a disability entitled to statutory protection.

Wrongful Termination:

Termination of employment cannot be classified as "Wrongful Termination" unless it is in violation of some fundamental public policy, as set forth in a state or federal statute, regulation or constitutional provision. Examples of Wrongful Termination include situations where:

  • An employee is discharged for failure to comply with an order to perform an act that violates some law, ordinance or regulation, or
  • An employee is discharged in retaliation for complaints about conduct by the employer that he or she believes to be unlawful, e.g., failure to pay overtime, or failure to comply with safety regulations.

Sexual Harassment:
Sexual harassment is any unwanted and unwelcome sexual behavior. It involves a broad range of conduct, including such verbal harassment as derogatory comments, explicit sexual comments and descriptions of sexual exploits, leering or requesting sexual favors. The term also describes physical harassment, ranging from inappropriate touching to outright sexual assault. In order to be classified as illegal the conduct in question must be both unwelcome and offensive to the victim.

Sexual harassment is a form of sexual discrimination, prohibited in employment settings under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title IX of the 1972 Education Act makes sexual harassment in schools or other educational settings unlawful. The Federal Fair Housing Act also provides protection against sexual harassment, and most states have enacted legislation making it unlawful.

Overtime Compensation:

Under both State and Federal law employers are required to pay additional compensation to eligible employees who work more than forty hours during any seven-day period. For every hour over forty hours in any given workweek the employer must pay the eligible employee at least one and one-half times the employee's ordinary hourly rate.

Defamation (Libel & Slander):

Defamation is the communication of a false and unprivileged statement that exposes another to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or which causes him or her to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him or her in his or her trade or occupation. The defamatory statement must be communicated to someone other than the person to whom it refers and it must refer to a living person.

Defamation communicated verbally it is called "Slander," but if it is communicated in writing, it is called "Libel". As a general rule it is easier to recover damages in a lawsuit for libel than in a slander lawsuit. Most defamation litigation in the employment arena concerns the employer’s “qualified privilege” to defame. & Under this concept, employers and former employers are often protected from liability for defaming employees or former employees. By its very definition, however, the privilege is “qualified,” and not “absolute”. It is generally limited to situations in which the employer or former employer is making a good faith communication of information to someone who has a legitimate interest in receiving it. A good example of this is a former employer’s good faith response to a new or prospective employer’s inquiry about the job performance of a former employee.  Generally speaking, even if the information given is false and damaging and would otherwise give rise to a defamation lawsuit, it will be protected under the “qualified” privilege.

If the communication exceeds the scope of the privilege, the privilege is not available. For example, if the communication to your new or prospective employer is not in response to an inquiry, but a voluntary and unsolicited communication, liability for defamation will attach if the information is untrue. Even if the communication is made in response to prospective employer’s inquiry, false and damaging information will not be protected by the privilege if it is made with knowledge or reckless disregard of its falsity, or with the intent to cause injury to the former employee. It is important to remember that however damaging it may be, a truthful statement cannot form the basis of a defamation lawsuit. This legal truism is often expressed in the phrase:  "The Truth is a complete defense to a defamation action".

Severance Agreements:

A severance agreement is a form of settlement agreement under which an aggrieved employee agrees to accept an agreed sum of money in exchange for, among other things, abandoning all claims against the employer.  Where it can be negotiated, a severance agreement saves money and aggravation for both sides. Severance agreements commonly include such provisions as "mutual non-disclosure of terms," an agreement that the employee will not compete against the employer, and that neither the employer nor the employee will make negative comments about the other.

Trade Secrets Agreements:

Employment contracts frequently contain provisions for the protection of the employer’s “trade secrets”. These may range from customer data of one kind or another, to company designs, or even “secret recipes”. Typically, the Trade Secrets clause of an employment contract will provide for “liquidated” damages in the event of disclosure of the information. Liquidated damages are a set dollar figure agreed-upon in advance, to be paid in the event the contract clause is violated.

Non-competition Agreements:

Non-competition agreements are provisions contained within an employment contract which restrict the activities of an employee after leaving the service of the company. Courts treat non-competition agreements with suspicion—with an eye toward preventing unnecessary and unreasonable interference with a person’s livelihood after severance of the employer/employee relationship.

The Courts will often decline to enforce “unreasonable” non-competition agreements. A non-competition clause in the agreement under which a used car lot employs an auto mechanic will likely be summarily rejected by the court as unreasonable. The agreement must be reasonable in duration. A non-competition agreement barring the sales manager of a used car lot from engaging in the used car business for the rest of his or her life, or for 50 years, would probably be denied enforcement, while one with a 2-year term might well be enforced.  Non-competition agreements must be reasonable in the area covered. If the agreement precludes the sales manager from engaging in the used car business anywhere in North America, it will almost certainly be denied enforcement as unreasonable. If the area is limited to Anaheim, for example, it would probably withstand court scrutiny.

Whistleblower Claims:

Whistleblower Claims involve employer retaliation, sometimes to the extent of Wrongful Termination, against an employee who reports the improper or unlawful conduct of another employee or of management itself to government authorities. It is illegal for an employer to retaliate against a “whistleblower.”

Administrative Law:

Administrative Law is a system of justice outside the judicial system that is designed to bring resolution to conflicts arising within a detailed and technical structure of regulations. Administrative Law Courts have a reputation for resolving issues with greater speed and efficiency than the judicial system. Final Administrative Law decisions can be challenged in the Courts, but not until all administrative remedies have been exhausted. Final Administrative Law decisions can also be converted to Court Judgments and then enforced by any of the traditional remedies available for the enforcement of civil judgments.

Injunctions:

Injunctions are a type of Court Order that either requires or prohibits specified conduct or behavior. Injunctions are remedies frequently used in employment cases. They involve such situations as injunctions requiring striking public employees to return to work, or injunctions requiring someone to stop engaging in an unlawful employment practice.  Willful failure to comply with an injunction can lead to a citation for contempt of court, and can result in significant money sanctions or even time in jail for the purpose of coercing compliance.

Workers’ Compensation:

Workers’ Compensation is a state-run system under which employees receive various types and levels of compensation for on-the-job injuries. Generally speaking, the dollar amount of compensation in Workers’ Compensation cases is much lower than in ordinary civil actions to recover damages for personal injuries. On the other hand, the level of proof required is much lower than in a personal injury case. The claimant in a Workers’ Compensation case is not required to prove that the employer was negligent or otherwise at fault. All the claimant need establish in a Workers' Compensation case is that the employee was injured in the course of his or her employment, and that the injury was not the result of the employee's own willful misconduct.

Employment Policy Manuals & Employee Handbooks:

An extraordinarily high percentage of Employment Law conflicts arise because there simply is no established company policy on a particular issue or the existing policy is either unknown or poorly understood. Competent Employment Law counsel can help draft and put together a company policy manual that is both comprehensive and understandable, and an employee handbook that leaves no doubt as to what is expected from each employee, and what he or she can expect from the company.

If you or someone you know in Orange County or throughout Southern California needs the assistance of an experienced California Labor & Employment Attorney, call HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC today at 866-287-3662, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.

Professional Profiles

If you or someone you know in Orange County or throughout Southern California needs the assistance of an experienced California Labor & Employment Attorney, call HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC today at 866-287-3662, or complete the contact form provided on this site to schedule your free consultation.

ADDRESS OF THE FIRM:
HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC
Arena Corporate Center
1600 South Douglass Road, First Floor
Anaheim, CA 92806
Telephone: 866-287-3662

MEMBERS OF THE FIRM:

Vincent D. Howard

Mr. Howard is the founder and managing partner of the firm. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology with an emphasis in Social Psychology from the University of Nevada-Reno where he graduated with Distinction. He earned his Juris Doctor degree from Western State University College of Law where he graduated Deans Scholar.

Mr. Howard proudly served in the United States Army as a military police officer (1988-92). He was Honorably Discharged in 1992 as an E-4 Specialist. The highlight of his military police career was when he provided security for former Vice President James Danforth Quayle and then Secretary of Defense Richard Bruce Cheney during their visits to Seoul, South Korea. He received the Army Good Conduct Medal; Overseas Medal; National Defense Ribbon; and Marksmanship Medal (pistol, rifle). Mr. Howard also served during Operation Desert Storm.

Before founding HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC, Mr. Howard worked with the Riverside County District Attorneys Office where he prosecuted several criminal trials. He went on to work for the prestigious Newport Beach, California law firm of Lopez Hodes Restaino Milman & Skikos, where he concentrated his practice on plaintiff's personal injury, mass tort, and pharmaceutical litigation. In addition to these practice areas, Mr. Howard also focuses on employment law and criminal defense. He has worked on several complex litigations including Guidant, Mifeprex (RU-486), Ortho Evra, and the Wal-Mart Gender Bias case.

Mr. Howard was also instrumental in litigating several cases against military defense contractor Halliburton Company. He was liaison to Representative Henry Waxman’s office where he prepared information regarding the Fisher v. Halliburton litigation to Congressman Waxman and his staff in Washington, D.C. to educate his office about the need for a formal Congressional inquiry. He has also given interviews to LA Times reporter T. Christian Miller, as well as Inside Edition, FOX News 10 and WKRG News 5 (Alabama), CorpWatch, Army Times, and Bloomberg News regarding the Fisher v. Halliburton litigation. In addition, Mr. Howard has a published opinion regarding the case (Fisher vs. Halliburton, 390 F.Supp.2d 610 (S.D. Tex. 2005).

During Mr. Howard’s career, he has tried several cases and assisted in the recovery of several hundreds of thousands of dollars for the good people of California and across the nation. He attributes his success and the success of the attorney’s at HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC to their hard work and their ardent belief that “people choose us because we’re your favorite lawyer’s favorite lawyer.”

Mr. Howard is a member of the State Bar of California and is admitted to practice in all the Courts of the State of California. He has also been admitted pro hac vice in several jurisdictions. He is a member and serves on the Board of Directors for the Orange County Trial Lawyers Association (OCTLA), Consumer Attorneys of California, and the Robert Banyard Inn of Court. He is a member of the Orange County Bar Association, National Association of Consumer Attorneys (NACA), and the American Association for Justice (AAJ). He is frequently invited to speak at law schools and program events on various topics about the law.


Damian J. Nassiri
Mr. Nassiri is a co-founding partner of HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC. His practice focuses on consumer protection litigation, with a particular concentration in the areas of predatory mortgage lending, mortgage loan servicing abuses, and fraud and foreclosure "rescue scams". Mr. Nassiri frequently lectures on these topics at CLE functions.

Mr. Nassiri is a tireless champion of the people. Among his earlier notable achievements was successfully advancing the interests of his client in a ground breaking 14th amendment Due Process case which resulted in a published opinion by the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The important civil rights decision impacted the notice requirement which is to be given by the government before a citizen may be deprived of their property. (See Clement v. City of Glendale, 2008 WL 638360 (C.A.9 (Cal.)), Case No. 05-56692, D.C. No. CV-02-02555-FMC).

Mr. Nassiri earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Biochemistry from California State University Fullerton and his Juris Doctorate degree from Western State University College of Law. Mr. Nassiri graduated from law school cum laude and was ranked in the top 20% of his class. During law school, Mr. Nassiri was a Judicial Extern for presiding Justice David G. Sills at the California court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three.

Mr. Nassiri is a member of the State Bar of California and is admitted to practice in all Courts in the State of California. Mr. Nassiri is also a member of the American Association for Justice, Consumer Attorneys of California, Orange County Trial Lawyers Association, National Association of Consumer Attorneys, Homeowner Defense Advocate, and the Robert Banyard Inn of Court.

Additional Questions or need further information?

Vincent D. Howard
Damian J. Nassiri
HOWARD | NASSIRI, PC
Arena Corporate Center
1600 South Douglass Road, First Floor
Anaheim, CA 92806
Phone: 866-287-3662

Remember, the more information you provide, the easier it is for us to help you.

How would you categorize the incident?

Discrimination
Harassment
Wrongful termination
Other

Please describe the incident and your role in it:


* Please enter the security code shown below:

Captcha Image

      

 

Experience, Ethics, Reputation.
Choose With Confidence.

Lawyers featured on LawInfo.com must be Lead Counsel Rated

Why Choose a Lead Counsel Rated Attorney?

  1. Professional Experience: Lead Counsel Attorneys average 21.6 years experience practicing law.
  2. Relevant Experience: Lead Counsel Attorneys devote at least 30% of their practices to the area of law in which they're listed.
  3. Reputation: LawInfo conducts peer reference checks to verify status and reputation in the legal community.
  4. Spotless Record: All Lead Counsel Attorneys are verified to be in good standing with their state bar associations and have no client related disciplinary action.

The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Attorney Advertising
Lawyer Marketing by Lawinfo.com
Copyright © 2009 LawInfo.com, Inc. All rights are reserved.
No portion of this site may be reproduced in any manner in any medium without the express written consent of LawInfo.com, Inc.
close

Call Us Now!
866-287-3662